Patient Capital Management is a Baltimore asset manager founded in 2020 by Samantha McLemore, CFA — Bill Miller's long-time co-manager (working together since 2002, running the flagship Opportunity Equity strategy since 2014). Continuing the Miller-school contrarian tradition, it practices "time arbitrage": exploiting behavioral mispricing to concentrate in controversial growth names (tech, healthcare, Bitcoin-related) at deep discounts to intrinsic value. Its site preserves Bill Miller's complete 1995-2022 market letters, alongside ongoing quarterly letters and webinars.

This report says the stock market is booming and people are getting overconfident. The author instead bought beaten-down healthcare stocks and beat the market. His advice: when everyone is euphoric, stay patient and wait for bargains, don't chase hot AI stocks. He warns that 'buy the dip' has become a dangerous consensus. Worth reading because it uses real data and history to show why you shouldn't get swept up in the hype.
Patient Capital research article discusses the current market being in the late-cycle bull phase, with investor sentiment optimistic but bubble risks present. The core view is that while the path of least resistance remains upward, the heightened enthusiasm suggests caution. Key conclusions include:
This chapter discusses the current market being in the late-stage bull phase, where investor sentiment shifts from caution to optimism and even euphoria. The author argues that the path of least resistance for the market remains upward, but the rising enthusiasm warrants caution. Using "heat" as a metaphor, the report draws parallels between extreme weather and the "red-hot" performance of the semiconductor sector, prompting reflections on market sentiment and investment discipline.
The author's core investment argument is: Although the overall market may still rise, excessive optimism and complacency among investors are approaching dangerous territory, and a contrarian strategy of patiently waiting for undervalued opportunities will be rewarded. Counterintuitive judgments include:
| Stock | First-Half Return |
|---|---|
| RPRX | 46.5% |
| PGEN | 36.4% |
| ILMN | 34.1% |
| CVS | 32.5% |
| UNH | 27.6% |
| BIIB | 22.8% |
| TEM | -1.9% |
| Company/Asset | Role | Key Data | Bullish/Bearish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia (NVDA) | Only semiconductor holding in the strategy | Stock price $202.78, lagged market in first half | Neutral (held but no excess return) |
| RPRX | Healthcare holding | Up 46.5% in first half | Bullish |
| PGEN | Healthcare holding | Up 36.4% in first half | Bullish |
| ILMN | Healthcare holding | Up 34.1% in first half | Bullish |
| CVS | Healthcare holding | Up 32.5% in first half | Bullish |
| UNH | Healthcare holding | Up 27.6% in first half | Bullish |
| BIIB | Healthcare holding | Up 22.8% in first half | Bullish |
| TEM | Healthcare holding | Down 1.9% in first half | Neutral (worst performer) |
| SpaceX (SPCX) | Speculative sentiment indicator | Completed largest IPO ever, raised $86B | No clear direction (market sentiment reference) |
| Uber, Microsoft | AI cost control examples | Limiting AI usage to manage costs | No clear direction (industry trend reference) |
This chapter focuses on whether the return on invested capital (ROIC) for AI infrastructure investments is sustainable and addresses market concerns about the risk of model commoditization. The author argues that despite pessimistic sentiment, the current ROIC for AI data centers is very strong, and the overall market environment remains favorable.
The author’s central judgment is that the risk of AI model commoditization is overestimated, the current ROIC for AI data centers is as high as 30-40%, and public market valuations are reasonable. The counterintuitive aspect is that the author actively seeks out pessimistic areas within an overall optimistic market (low volatility), using high individual stock volatility to add positions contrarily, rather than chasing popular tech stocks.
1. Empirical Evidence on AI Data Center ROIC: Citing analysis from the Journal of a Golfing Investor, contracts involving xAI, Google, and Anthropic show remarkable returns:
| Metric | Google Deal | Anthropic Deal |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Contract Revenue | $11.0B | $15.0B |
| Operating Costs | -$0.7B | -$1.25B |
| Cash Operating Profit | $10.3B | $13.75B |
| Depreciation (4-year life) | -$3.75B | -$5.25B |
| Operating Profit | $6.55B | $8.50B |
| Capital Base | $15B | $21B |
| Pre-tax ROIC | ~44% | ~40% |
| After-tax ROIC (21% tax rate) | ~35% | ~32% |
2. Demand Continues to Outstrip Supply: AWS raised prices in early July, indicating that overall demand still exceeds supply, which is the most critical factor.
3. Individual Stock Volatility Creates Opportunities: Although overall market volatility is low, the VIX for individual S&P 500 stocks remains high, providing ongoing opportunities for contrarian investing.
4. QXO Case Study: The stock price has fallen 50% from its highs, driven by arbitrage pressure from the Topbuild deal and fund expectations of a weak quarter (fewer storms reducing roofing business, weak housing market). The author views these short-term pressures as buying opportunities, expecting a compound annual growth rate of approximately 30% over the next 3-5 years, with company profits growing 2-3 times by 2030.
5. Valuation Comparison of Payment Companies:
| Company | Current Price | Key Characteristics | Expected Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Payments (GPN) | $74.38 | Traditional acquiring merchant acquirer, stock down 2/3 from 2021 highs, reached agreement with activist investor Elliott | Expected FCF/share of ~$10 next year (13% FCF yield), rising to $14+ by 2028 (19% yield), mostly used for buybacks |
| Adyen (ADYEN) | €834.50 | Leader in digital payment infrastructure, stock down nearly 60% from 2025 highs | Core e-commerce penetration ~50%, significant growth potential in omnichannel and international markets, expected mid-to-high single-digit revenue growth, return rate of 15-20%+ |
6. Meta (META): Down 14% over the past year, with market concerns that its AI investments could turn free cash flow negative. The author believes Meta has strong AI talent and computing power; if investments pay off, it could replicate Alphabet’s success path.