Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.
This report uses sports examples—like rookie quarterbacks vs. aging MVPs—to argue that in investment management, age and experience are assets, not liabilities. For everyday investors, it means don’t just chase young fund managers; seasoned teams with solid succession plans (like McDonald’s) may be more reliable. It challenges the hype around “rookie managers” and warns against relying on a single star. Worth reading to avoid a common pitfall in fund selection.
Oakmark's investment research report opens with a comparison between rising stars and seasoned veterans in the sports world, centering on the long-term value of experience accumulation in the investment industry. The report notes that while NFL rookie quarterbacks have delivered impressive performan
This chapter uses the contrast between rising stars and seasoned veterans in the sports world as a lead-in to discuss the long-term value of experience accumulation in the investment industry. The report notes that despite standout performances from NFL rookie quarterbacks (such as Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III), the MVP candidates remain 36-year-old Peyton Manning and 35-year-old Tom Brady; 38-year-old R.A. Dickey won the Cy Young Award, and the New York Knicks, with the NBA's oldest roster averaging nearly 33 years old, achieved their best start to a season. The report emphasizes that the career path in investing is closer to that of a sports journalist than an athlete: experience continues to appreciate with age.
The author's core investment argument is: The investment management industry is a field where experience continuously appreciates, and age and long-term experience are advantages, not disadvantages. This stands in stark contrast to the career trajectory of athletes—who face physical decline in their 30s—while investment managers can remain highly effective well into their 70s. Counterintuitively, the report argues that the market's enthusiasm for "rookie managers" may be excessive, and that managers with long-term experience, along with their succession plans, are the key to sustainable investing.
1. Contrast of Experience and Age in Sports:
2. Career Path of Sports Journalists:
3. Age and Succession of Investment Managers:
4. Oakmark's Own Case:
| Company/Asset | Role | Key Data | Bullish/Bearish |
|---|---|---|---|
| McDonald's | Exemplar of succession planning | All managers must have at least two emergency succession candidates; two CEOs died within nine months, yet operations were uninterrupted | Bullish (as a best-practice case) |
| Oakmark Funds | Subject of the report | Two managers retired in 2012, but team depth was sufficient; all current managers are younger than the youngest 70-something manager in the Wall Street Journal article | Bullish (emphasizing robust succession planning) |
| Washington Redskins | Succession case | After rookie quarterback RG3 was injured, another rookie, Kirk Cousins, led the team to consecutive wins | Neutral (as an example of the "next man up" strategy) |
1. Focus on Management Team Depth Rather Than a Single Star Manager: Investors should prioritize fund companies with clear succession plans and sufficient team depth, rather than relying on individual star managers. Oakmark's case shows that even when managers retire, the team can seamlessly transition.
2. Long-Term Experience Is an Advantage in Investing: Unlike in sports, investment managers' experience appreciates with age. Managers in their 70s can still effectively run funds, and the market's enthusiasm for "rookie managers" may overestimate the short-term performance of younger managers.
3. Beware of "Star Manager Dependency" Risk: Many small investment firms decline after a key person leaves. Investors should assess whether a fund company's organizational structure has the "next man up" capability, similar to McDonald's succession culture.
4. Succession Planning Is a Prerequisite for Long-Term Investing: Oakmark emphasizes that even without retirement plans, preparations must be made for "unwanted events." Investors should require fund companies to disclose details of their succession plans as part of due diligence.
This chapter continues the report’s discussion on the long-term value of an investment career, using the career of baseball pitcher Jim Bouton as an analogy to emphasize that investing, like sports, is a captivating endeavor requiring long-term commitment. Through this, the author expresses the Oakmark fund managers’ passion for their work and reiterates the core characteristics of their investment strategy: concentrated holdings and long-term holding.
The author’s central thesis is that investing is a “fascinating” pursuit, and fund managers’ love for their work serves as the intrinsic driving force behind long-term adherence to value investing. This aligns with the earlier judgment that “experience continues to appreciate with age,” highlighting the connection between professional passion and long-term performance. The counterintuitive aspect is that the report does not shy away from the high volatility brought by concentrated holdings; instead, it views this as a necessary cost for achieving long-term excess returns.