← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly31 Dec 2012Source: oakmark.com

David Herro Market Commentary | 4Q12

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report shows how two international stock funds performed by the end of 2012. They had strong one-year returns (29% and 18%), but over five years, due to the financial crisis, they averaged only 3.5% and 1.8% per year. For regular investors, this means: don't focus on short-term ups and downs—holding for the long term (like 10 years) tends to pay off. But watch out for higher fees on small-cap funds (which invest in smaller companies). It's worth reading because it uses real numbers to show that value investing (buying cheap, good companies) works over time.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

The Oakmark research report outlines the performance of its International Fund and International Small Cap Fund as of December 31, 2012. The core view is that both funds achieved positive returns, with the Oakmark International Fund posting a 1-year return of 29.22% and an annualized return of 10.37

~3 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section presents the performance data of the Oakmark International Fund and the Oakmark International Small Cap Fund as of December 31, 2012, providing investors with the returns and fee structures of the two funds across different time horizons.

Core Thesis

The report's central judgment is that both funds achieved positive returns, with long-term (10-year) returns significantly outperforming short-term (5-year) returns, indicating the effectiveness of a value investing strategy over the long term. Counterintuitively, although 5-year returns were lower due to market volatility (e.g., the financial crisis) at 3.52% and 1.80%, the 1-year returns were as high as 29.22% and 18.39%, respectively, demonstrating a strong short-term rebound.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Oakmark International Fund: Since its inception in 1992, the annualized return is 10.37%, the 10-year annualized return is 11.23%, the 1-year return is 29.22%, and the expense ratio is 1.06%.
  • Oakmark International Small Cap Fund: Since its inception in 1995, the annualized return is 9.95%, the 10-year annualized return is 12.41%, the 1-year return is 18.39%, and the expense ratio is 1.41%.
  • The comparative data is as follows:
Metric Oakmark International Fund Oakmark International Small Cap Fund
Annualized Return Since Inception 10.37% (since 1992) 9.95% (since 1995)
10-Year Annualized Return 11.23% 12.41%
5-Year Annualized Return 3.52% 1.80%
1-Year Return 29.22% 18.39%
3-Month Return 13.82% 8.69%
Expense Ratio (as of September 30, 2012) 1.06% 1.41%

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark International Fund: The fund itself, with strong performance, a 1-year return of 29.22%, and a relatively low expense ratio (1.06%), bullish.
  • Oakmark International Small Cap Fund: The fund itself, with a 1-year return of 18.39% and a higher expense ratio (1.41%), but its 10-year annualized return (12.41%) outperforms the International Fund (11.23%), bullish.

Investment Insights

  • Long-term holding of value-oriented international funds: Both funds achieved 10-year annualized returns exceeding 11%, indicating that an international value investing strategy can effectively navigate cycles over a 10-year horizon. Investors should focus on long-term returns rather than short-term fluctuations.
  • Fee sensitivity in small-cap funds: The small-cap fund's expense ratio (1.41%) is higher than that of the large-cap fund (1.06%), but its 10-year annualized return is also higher (12.41% vs. 11.23%). Investors need to weigh the cost-effectiveness of fees versus excess returns.
  • Short-term rebound opportunities: The 1-year returns (29.22% and 18.39%) show a strong rebound after market lows, but the 5-year returns (3.52% and 1.80%) highlight risks. It is recommended that investors avoid chasing highs and selling lows, and instead adhere to dollar-cost averaging or long-term holding.