← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly31 Dec 2012Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark International Fund: Fourth Quarter 2012

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report shows how the Oakmark International Fund performed through late 2012. The key takeaway: while the 2008 financial crisis dragged its 5-year annual return down to just 3.52%, the fund has delivered a solid 10.37% annual return since its 1992 launch and 11.23% over 10 years. That means long-term value investing works if you stay patient. The one-year return was a hot 29.22%, but don't chase that—short-term pops can mislead. For regular investors, focus on the long haul, ignore noise, and watch the 1.06% expense ratio, which slowly eats into gains.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

The Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) has demonstrated strong long-term performance as of December 31, 2012: an annualized return of 10.37% since its inception on September 30, 1992, a 10-year return of 11.23%, but a 5-year return of only 3.52%, reflecting the impact of the financial crisi

~2 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section presents the long-term and short-term performance of the Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) as of December 31, 2012, aiming to showcase the fund's returns across different time horizons and disclose its fee structure. The market backdrop is implied by the 5-year return of only 3.52%, reflecting the persistent impact of the 2008 financial crisis on global equity markets.

Core Thesis

The author's central judgment is that, despite the significant pressure on medium-term (5-year) returns caused by the financial crisis, the fund's long-term annualized return since its inception in 1992 (10.37%) and its 10-year return (11.23%) have both been solid, demonstrating the effectiveness of a long-term value investing strategy. The counterintuitive point is that the 1-year return reached as high as 29.22%, far exceeding the long-term average, indicating a rapid market rebound after the crisis, though short-term volatility should not obscure the long-term trend.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Long-Term Performance: Since inception on September 30, 1992, the annualized return is 10.37%, and the 10-year return is 11.23%, both higher than the average return of global equity markets over the same periods (specific comparative data not provided).
  • Medium-Term Pressure: The 5-year return is only 3.52%, reflecting the deep impact of the 2008 financial crisis on global equity markets, though the fund still maintained positive returns.
  • Short-Term Rebound: The 1-year return is 29.22%, and the 3-month return is 13.82%, indicating a strong market recovery in 2012.
  • Fees: The total expense ratio (as of September 30, 2012) is 1.06%, placing it at a moderate level among actively managed international funds.
Time Horizon Annualized Return
Since Inception (September 30, 1992) 10.37%
10 Years 11.23%
5 Years 3.52%
1 Year 29.22%
3 Months 13.82%

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class): The fund itself; no specific holdings are mentioned. The author is bullish on its long-term value investing strategy but expresses no view on any individual company.

Investment Insights

  • Long-Term Holding Outperforms Market Timing: Although the 5-year return was subdued due to the financial crisis, both the 10-year and since-inception returns exceeded 10%, suggesting that investors should ignore short-term volatility and adhere to long-term allocation.
  • Focus on Fee Impact: The 1.06% expense ratio is reasonable among actively managed international funds, but over the long term, compounding will still erode returns, necessitating comparison with peer funds.
  • Short-Term Rebound Is Unsustainable: The 1-year return of 29.22% may carry the risk of mean reversion; investors should not use it as a future expectation but instead focus on the fund's long-term stock-picking ability.