Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.
This report argues that despite a big stock market rally in early 2012, it's not too late to invest. Companies have strong cash flows and can boost earnings per share (profit per share) by about 7% annually through dividends (paying shareholders) and buybacks (companies buying their own stock to reduce shares), even if the economy doesn't grow. For regular investors, this means stocks may still be a better deal than bonds (low-risk, low-return investments), especially with inflation (rising prices) risk. It's worth reading because it uses real data to show why opportunities remain, without hype.
The Oakmark report opens with a quote from Warren Buffett, emphasizing that investing is about sacrificing current consumption in exchange for greater future consumption. The core argument is that, despite the S&P 500 rising 13% in the first quarter of 2012, stocks remain undervalued and are prefera
This chapter discusses whether investors have missed the window to enter the market following the sharp rally in U.S. stocks during the first quarter of 2012. The report notes that despite the S&P 500 surging 13% in a single quarter—exceeding the total return of a seven-year Treasury bond over its entire life—the author argues that stocks remain undervalued and that now is not the time to exit.
The author’s central judgment is: it is not too late to invest in stocks now. The counterintuitive point is that, despite the market’s substantial rise, strong corporate cash flows and balance sheets will drive dividend growth, share buybacks, and mergers and acquisitions, enabling earnings per share (EPS) to achieve meaningful growth even in a no-growth economy. The author explicitly believes that stocks remain a superior choice relative to bonds.
1. Corporate cash flows have already begun to translate into shareholder returns: Using a sample of 56 companies in the Oakmark Fund portfolio, the report illustrates actual capital allocation behavior in 2011:
2. The mathematical logic of EPS growth: The author emphasizes that even with only 4% economic growth, combined with a 3% reduction in shares, EPS can achieve 7% growth. This mechanism is widely overlooked by the market.
3. Extremely low dividend payout ratio: In 2012, the consensus dividend expectation for the S&P 500 accounts for only 28% of expected earnings. Even if dividends grow 9% year-over-year, 72% of earnings remain available for buybacks and M&A.
4. Comparison between stocks and bonds:
| Metric | Stocks | Bonds |
|---|---|---|
| Current yield | Higher than intermediate-term Treasuries | Historic lows |
| Inflation protection | Yes (earnings growth accelerates) | No |
| Valuation level | Slightly below long-term average P/E | Prices near historic highs |
This chapter continues the core theme of the Oakmark report, namely that stocks remain significantly undervalued relative to bonds. The author further argues that even in a zero economic growth environment, corporate earnings per share (EPS) can still achieve considerable growth through dividend increases and share buybacks, so it is not too late to invest in stocks.
The author believes that the current stock market is not overheated and investment opportunities still exist. The core argument is that even without economic growth, companies using excess cash flow to raise dividends and repurchase shares can drive EPS growth at an annual rate of approximately 7%. This judgment runs counter to market consensus, as many investors worry that the market has already risen too much and that the best entry point has been missed.
| Indicator | Data |
|---|---|
| Proportion of companies raising dividends | 75% (42 firms) |
| Median dividend increase | Over 11% |
| Proportion of companies reducing share count | 84% (47 firms) |
| Median share count reduction | Over 3% |
| Northrop Grumman share count reduction | 13% |
| DirecTV share count reduction | 14% |
| Kohl's share count reduction | 18% |
| EPS annual growth rate under zero growth | Approximately 7% |