← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly31 Dec 2011Source: oakmark.com

Bill Nygren Market Commentary | 4Q11

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This piece explains why 2011 was a volatile but flat market—the S&P 500 swung a lot but ended nearly unchanged, with most stocks moving together, limiting profit from trading. The key point: stocks are now much cheaper than bonds. Companies have higher earnings, fewer shares, bigger dividends, and more cash, while 10-year Treasury yields are below 2%, capping future bond returns. For regular investors, ignore daily noise and shift from bonds to stocks, as stocks offer far better long-term returns from here. Worth reading because it shows why past bond outperformance won't repeat.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

The Oakmark research article discusses the phenomenon of high market volatility but lack of direction in 2011, along with the response strategies of long-term value investors. The core argument is that although the S&P 500 experienced volatility exceeding 30% in 2011 (more than three times the level

~3 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This chapter discusses the peculiar phenomenon of high volatility but lack of direction in the 2011 market, as well as the strategies for long-term value investors in such an environment. The author notes that although the S&P 500's volatility exceeded 30% (more than triple the level five years earlier), the market closed the year nearly flat, with individual stocks moving in high correlation, limiting arbitrage opportunities from stock swaps.

Core Thesis

The author's core investment argument is: Stocks are significantly undervalued relative to bonds, presenting a generational asset allocation opportunity, but many investors, misled by bonds outperforming stocks over the past decade, have mistakenly reduced stock holdings and increased bond holdings. Counterintuitive judgments include: although stocks were also deemed cheap a year ago, corporate earnings are now higher, share counts are lower, dividends are higher, and cash reserves are larger, making the average stock more valuable than a year ago; meanwhile, bond yields are even lower, making them even more overvalued.

Key Arguments and Data

1. 2011 Volatility Characteristics:

  • The S&P 500's full-year high-low range was only 24%, below the 20-year average of 31%
  • In the second half of 2011, the number of days when 90% of S&P 500 components moved in the same direction exceeded the total for the five-year period from 2002 to 2006
  • Despite high volatility, the lack of direction limited arbitrage opportunities

2. Stock vs. Bond Valuation Comparison:

Metric One Year Ago Current
Corporate Earnings Lower Higher
Shares Outstanding More Fewer (EPS growth exceeds earnings growth)
Dividends Lower Higher
Cash Reserves Smaller Larger
10-Year Treasury Yield Lower (already deemed insufficient) Even Lower (<2%)
Stock Prices Same Level Same Level

3. Mathematical Limitations of Bond Returns:

  • Over the past decade, the 10-year zero-coupon Treasury returned 74%, but with current yields below 2%, even if rates fall to zero, the total return over the bond's life cannot exceed 20%
  • The author believes extrapolating past bond returns into the next decade is a major mistake

4. Logic for Future Stock Returns:

  • Stocks performed poorly over the past decade, but corporate earnings grew well, offset by a decline in P/E ratios from well above the historical average to slightly below it
  • Over the next decade, earnings growth is expected to continue, and P/E ratios are more likely to revert to the historical mean than to continue declining

Companies/Assets Involved

  • S&P 500 Index: Represents U.S. blue-chip stocks, used to illustrate overall market volatility and valuation characteristics
  • 10-Year U.S. Treasury Bond: Represents bond assets, with current yields below 2%; the author considers it overvalued with limited future returns
  • Zero-Coupon Treasury Bonds: Used to illustrate the non-replicability of high bond returns over the past decade

Investment Implications

  • Individual investors should ignore daily fluctuations, avoiding anxiety from frequent portfolio checks that could lead to irrational actions
  • Now is the time to sell bonds and buy stocks to restore target asset allocation. The author believes that, from current price levels, stocks will offer far higher long-term returns than bonds
  • Do not linearly extrapolate the past decade's strong bond performance; current bond yields are too low to replicate historical returns, while stock valuations are more attractive