Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.
This piece explains why 2011 was a volatile but flat market—the S&P 500 swung a lot but ended nearly unchanged, with most stocks moving together, limiting profit from trading. The key point: stocks are now much cheaper than bonds. Companies have higher earnings, fewer shares, bigger dividends, and more cash, while 10-year Treasury yields are below 2%, capping future bond returns. For regular investors, ignore daily noise and shift from bonds to stocks, as stocks offer far better long-term returns from here. Worth reading because it shows why past bond outperformance won't repeat.
The Oakmark research article discusses the phenomenon of high market volatility but lack of direction in 2011, along with the response strategies of long-term value investors. The core argument is that although the S&P 500 experienced volatility exceeding 30% in 2011 (more than three times the level
This chapter discusses the peculiar phenomenon of high volatility but lack of direction in the 2011 market, as well as the strategies for long-term value investors in such an environment. The author notes that although the S&P 500's volatility exceeded 30% (more than triple the level five years earlier), the market closed the year nearly flat, with individual stocks moving in high correlation, limiting arbitrage opportunities from stock swaps.
The author's core investment argument is: Stocks are significantly undervalued relative to bonds, presenting a generational asset allocation opportunity, but many investors, misled by bonds outperforming stocks over the past decade, have mistakenly reduced stock holdings and increased bond holdings. Counterintuitive judgments include: although stocks were also deemed cheap a year ago, corporate earnings are now higher, share counts are lower, dividends are higher, and cash reserves are larger, making the average stock more valuable than a year ago; meanwhile, bond yields are even lower, making them even more overvalued.
1. 2011 Volatility Characteristics:
2. Stock vs. Bond Valuation Comparison:
| Metric | One Year Ago | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate Earnings | Lower | Higher |
| Shares Outstanding | More | Fewer (EPS growth exceeds earnings growth) |
| Dividends | Lower | Higher |
| Cash Reserves | Smaller | Larger |
| 10-Year Treasury Yield | Lower (already deemed insufficient) | Even Lower (<2%) |
| Stock Prices | Same Level | Same Level |
3. Mathematical Limitations of Bond Returns:
4. Logic for Future Stock Returns: