Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.
This report explains why Oakmark International Fund lost 8.48% in late 2024, worse than the global market. But the fund manager isn't worried—he thinks his stocks are high-quality and very cheap. The biggest loser was Bayer (a German chemical/pharma company), which fell because of a lawsuit and weak profit outlook. The manager believes new CEO's turnaround plan will work, so he bought more. He also bought KB Financial Group, South Korea’s largest bank, because it has strong capital, low-cost deposits, and generous dividends. For regular investors: short-term dips can hide long-term value; fear is often a buying opportunity.
Oakmark Fund’s Q4 2024 report shows a fund return of -8.48%, underperforming the MSCI World ex USA Index’s -7.43%, but since inception, the cumulative return stands at 8.19%, outperforming the index’s 5.92%. Key insights: Airbus was the largest contributor, driven by order growth across all segments
This chapter serves as the opening overview of the Oakmark Fund's fourth-quarter 2024 report, primarily summarizing the fund's quarterly performance, key contributors and detractors, new holdings, and the regional distribution of the portfolio. In terms of market context, the fund underperformed its benchmark during the quarter but has maintained superior cumulative performance since inception.
The author argues that despite short-term performance pressure (quarterly return of -8.48%), the fund holds high-quality companies with extremely low valuations, making the medium- to long-term outlook still optimistic. A counterintuitive judgment: the decline in the largest detractor, Bayer, was mainly driven by developments in the PCB litigation and weak 2025 guidance. However, the author believes these factors have limited impact on value, and the new CEO's restructuring plan is expected to unlock potential.
| Company/Asset | Role | Key Data | Bullish/Bearish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Airbus | Largest contributor | Orders grew across all segments, inventory +11% YoY, November deliveries exceeded expectations | Bullish, capacity growth is key |
| Bayer | Largest detractor | PCB litigation risk increased, 2025 guidance shows profit decline, agricultural business under pressure | Bullish, new CEO's restructuring expected to improve |
| KB Financial Group | New holding | South Korea's largest bank, strong capital position, low-cost deposits, high shareholder returns | Bullish, attractive valuation |
| Kering | Increased position | Affected by weak Chinese demand, but Gucci product improvements expected to significantly boost margins within 2-3 years | Bullish, using share price weakness to increase position |
| Fresenius Medical Care | Contributor | No specific data provided | Bullish |
| Accor | Contributor | No specific data provided | Bullish |
| Glencore | Detractor | No specific data provided | Bearish |
| Hilton Worldwide | Mentioned | No specific data provided | Neutral |
| Pulte | Mentioned | No specific data provided | Neutral |