← Back to list
Oakmark FundsDeep research15 Oct 2025Source: oakmark.com

U.S. equities: Could the Russell 1000 Value be a less risky diversifier?

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This article explains that the S&P 500 index is becoming too concentrated in a few big companies like Apple and Microsoft, which increases risk if those stocks fall. The author suggests using the Russell 1000 Value index—a group of more diversified, cheaper stocks—as a safer alternative. For everyday investors, this means not just chasing popular growth stocks but also considering value stocks (companies with lower prices and steady profits) or funds that track them. It's worth reading because it highlights a hidden risk in today's market and offers a practical way to spread your bets.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

An Oakmark research article notes that the S&P 500 index is becoming increasingly concentrated. Robert Bierig emphasizes that the Russell 1000 Value index can provide diversification and argues that value stocks may be a compelling choice for investors seeking broader exposure and attractive valuati

~2 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This chapter focuses on the increasingly concentrated structural issue of the current S&P 500 index. The report’s author, Robert Bierig, points out that this concentration risk is rising, while the Russell 1000 Value index can provide effective diversification. He argues that value stocks represent a compelling choice for investors seeking broader market exposure and reasonable valuations.

Core Thesis

The author’s core investment argument is: Against the backdrop of heightened concentration risk in the S&P 500, value stocks (represented by the Russell 1000 Value) deserve significant attention from investors due to their diversification advantages and relatively undervalued valuations. This judgment contrasts with the current market trend of chasing large-cap growth stocks and represents a contrarian view.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Concentration Risk: The report states, “Today’s S&P 500 is increasingly concentrated,” but does not provide specific concentration data (e.g., the weight of the top 5 or top 10 constituents).
  • Diversification Advantage: The Russell 1000 Value index is highlighted as a tool offering diversified exposure, implying a more balanced sector distribution among its constituents compared to the concentrated structure of the S&P 500.
  • Valuation Appeal: Value stocks are described as having “attractive valuations,” but no specific price-to-earnings or price-to-book ratios are provided.

Companies/Assets Involved

  • S&P 500 Index: Serves as the benchmark for concentration risk; no specific constituents are mentioned.
  • Russell 1000 Value Index: Representing value stocks, it is recommended as a diversification tool.
  • Robert Bierig: An Oakmark analyst and the author of the views presented in this chapter.

Investment Implications

  • Allocation Direction: Investors should consider increasing their allocation to value stocks (e.g., Russell 1000 Value index funds or related ETFs) to hedge against S&P 500 concentration risk.
  • Risk Warning: Attention should be paid to the performance cycles of value stocks relative to growth stocks, as well as the impact of macroeconomic conditions (e.g., interest rate changes) on value strategies.