← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly31 Mar 2016Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark Fund: First Quarter 2016

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report covers Oakmark Fund's performance in early 2016. It lost 4% over the past year, but since 1991 it has averaged 12.35% annual returns. For everyday investors, the key takeaway is not to panic over short-term losses. Instead, focus on long-term results, pick low-cost funds (this one has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is below average), and stick with a value investing strategy (buying undervalued companies). The report is worth a read because it shows that patience pays off—short-term dips are normal.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

The Oakmark Fund (Investor Class) report as of March 31, 2016, shows that since its inception on August 5, 1991, the fund has achieved an annualized return of 12.35%, with returns of 8.02%, 11.35%, -4.00%, and -0.62% over the past 10 years, 5 years, 1 year, and 3 months, respectively. The core argum

~3 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section centers on the performance data of the Oakmark Fund (Investor Class) as of March 31, 2016, showcasing the fund's returns across different time horizons. The report aims to present the fund's historical performance to investors, emphasizing the stability of long-term returns while cautioning that short-term fluctuations (such as a one-year loss) should not be overinterpreted.

Core Thesis

The author's core investment argument is that the Oakmark Fund's long-term performance (annualized return of 12.35% since its inception in 1991) significantly outperforms its short-term results (a one-year loss of 4%), validating the effectiveness of a value investing strategy over the long run. The counterintuitive insight is that despite negative recent (one-year) returns, the fund achieved double-digit growth over both the 5-year and 10-year periods (11.35% and 8.02%, respectively), suggesting that short-term market volatility should not undermine confidence in a long-term strategy.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Outstanding Long-Term Performance: Since its inception on August 5, 1991, the annualized return stands at 12.35%, far exceeding the average market level over the same period.
  • Stable Medium-Term Results: The 5-year annualized return is 11.35%, and the 10-year annualized return is 8.02%, indicating the fund has maintained positive returns across multiple market cycles.
  • Short-Term Pressure: The 1-year return is -4.00%, and the 3-month return is -0.62%, reflecting recent challenges to the value strategy from the market environment.
  • Low Expense Ratio: The Gross Expense Ratio is 0.85%, below the industry average, which helps enhance long-term net returns.
Time Horizon Annualized Return
Since Inception (1991/08/05) 12.35%
10 Years 8.02%
5 Years 11.35%
1 Year -4.00%
3 Months -0.62%

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark Fund (Investor Class): The core fund analyzed in the report. The author holds a bullish view on its long-term performance, believing its value investing strategy is effective over the long run. Key data: annualized return of 12.35% since inception, expense ratio of 0.85%.

Investment Implications

  • Long-Term Holding Outperforms Short-Term Timing: Investors should overlook short-term (one-year) losses and focus on the fund's annualized return of over 12% since inception, avoiding redemptions driven by short-term volatility.
  • Expenses Are a Key Factor in Long-Term Returns: The expense ratio of 0.85% is lower than that of peer funds, suggesting investors prioritize low-cost products to maximize the compounding effect.
  • Value Strategy Requires Patience: The recent negative return (-4%) may stem from the market's periodic avoidance of value stocks, but historical data (5-year return of 11.35%) indicates that adhering to the strategy can capture mean reversion opportunities.