← Back to list
Colossus (Invest Like the Best / Business Breakdowns)Podcast17 Jun 2025Source: joincolossus.comHost: Patrick O'Shaughnessy

Jay Hoag - Keys to Successful Growth Investing - [Invest Like the Best, EP.429]

In plain words

In this interview, investing legend Jay Hoag argues that everyone is chasing SaaS and AI, leaving consumer internet (like mobile entertainment, music, gaming) overlooked—and that's exactly where the opportunity lies. With 5 billion smartphone users, he believes new winners will emerge. Key holdings: Netflix (TCV owned 43% at IPO, long-term hold), Spotify (another legendary long-term hold), and Expedia (also a long-term hold). The takeaway: don't just follow the crowd; the neglected consumer space could be the real goldmine.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

TCV co-founder Jay Hoag shared the core strategies of growth investing on the program. He believes that macro factors, such as regulation, have unexpectedly become central to tech investing, and holds a contrarian view: the consumer internet sector currently presents enormous opportunities, while mo

~10 min full read · 8 sections
Deep Analysis

This Issue at a Glance

Jay Hoag is the co‑founder of TCV (Technology Crossover Ventures), who pioneered the growth investing category. Over 30 years, he has invested in legendary companies such as Netflix, Spotify, and Expedia. The main thread of this issue: In the SaaS and AI frenzy, consumer internet has been severely overlooked, and that is precisely the biggest value opportunity today. The core judgment comes from Jay Hoag: “When the ball rolls to one side, everyone runs that way. I find it hard to believe that no new consumer internet company will be created in the next 10 or 20 years.”


Theme 1: Consumer Internet — The Overlooked Gold Mine

Jay Hoag believes that the current market obsession with SaaS and AI has gone too far, making consumer internet the most attractive contrarian investment opportunity.

  • Market Imbalance: Capital is chasing SaaS and AI, while consumer internet has been all but forgotten. Jay Hoag quotes a founder: it is difficult for him to find good venture capitalists focused on consumers — "it's almost an endangered species."
  • Fundamentals Unchanged: There are over 5 billion smartphone users globally, with extremely high engagement in gaming, music, entertainment, and other areas. "A massive opportunity set of 5 billion smartphone users, this level of engagement should create enormous opportunities for new consumer franchises."
  • High Barrier ≠ No Opportunity: He acknowledges that breaking through the "virtual shelf space" in consumer internet is difficult, but that does not mean there are none. "I don't think the white space has shrunk."

Deduction and Validation: Jay Hoag points out that new consumer internet companies take time. Signal for validation: whether a new consumer application/platform achieves a breakthrough in user scale and secures large-scale funding.


Theme 2: The Commercialization Trap of Technology—Overestimated in the Near Term, Underestimated in the Long Term

Jay Hoag warns that investors often overestimate the short-term impact of technology while underestimating its long-term impact—the most common "fool's gold" pattern in growth investing.

  • Historical lessons: Autonomous driving—pure technologists claimed it was "ready" 5–7 years ago, yet it is still searching for a commercialization path. The same applies to AR/VR—enormous opportunities but still "searching for commercialization."
  • Core principle: "It's not the availability of technology, but the applicability of technology"—one must answer: What is the profit model? How strong is the defensibility? How large and durable a franchise can be built? "It's not just about having the hot tool of the day."
  • "Desert of disappointment": Every great company goes through what investors perceive as a "desert of disappointment." Apple was declared dead in 2000; Microsoft "wandered" in the eyes of investors for more than a decade. "It does not rise linearly for the vast majority of companies."

Deduction and validation: Jay Hoag argues that investors should focus on the time gap between technology becoming "available" and its "commercialization." Validation signals: whether the actual revenue scale and user growth rate of new technology meet expectations.


Theme 3: Public vs. Private Markets — The "Lifeless" IPO Market Is Baffling

Jay Hoag is baffled by the current IPO market slump, arguing that the best companies benefit from going public over the long term.

  • Scale comparison: In 1994, the entire venture capital industry raised $4 billion; today that is just a "small fund". Nasdaq rose from 751 at the end of 1994 to over 17,000 currently (23x). In 1991, only 31 large tech companies had a market cap over $1 billion; today, 6 have over $1 trillion.
  • Weak IPO market: We are in the "fourth year of dismal numbers". Even in mediocre years, historically there have been 50–60 US tech IPOs. "I am completely baffled by this."
  • Why companies should go public: Provides public currency, offers continuous liquidity for employees' stock, and brings "public market discipline". "I'm old-school and believe that the vast majority of the best companies benefit from being public over the long term."
  • Excess private capital: A large amount of private capital (tender offers from companies like Stripe) is creating liquidity, but this is only liquidity for the "best companies", not all.

Deduction and Verification: Jay Hoag believes that massive private capital needs returns and will ultimately need the IPO market. Verification signals: whether IPO numbers recover, and whether large private companies (such as Stripe) ultimately choose to go public.



Theme 4: The "Golden Mean" of Growth Investing — Low Risk, High Return

Jay Hoag explains the unique position of growth investing on the risk-return spectrum: it eliminates technology risk while retaining high growth potential.

  • Three-category framework:
  • Early-stage venture capital: Investing in "science projects"; successful ones can generate 50–100x returns, but the loss rate is as high as 30–50%.
  • Large private equity: Investing in larger, slower-growing companies, generating returns through leverage, cost cutting, and acquisitions.
  • Growth investing (TCV's position): Investing after technology risk has been eliminated — the product/service already exists and is being used by consumers or businesses. Lower risk of principal loss, while capturing high-growth opportunities like Netflix, Spotify, etc.
  • Economic model: About half of the portfolio companies are profitable at the time of investment, half are not. But the compounding effect of "top-line growth and extremely high incremental operating margins" means that earnings growth ultimately accelerates. Almost no leverage — all driven by company building and growth.

Deduction and validation: The appeal of growth investing lies in "the least competition" and "the most interesting game." Jay Hoag believes that after a flood of capital poured into growth investing in 2021, much of it has proven to be "broken capital," and competition is actually declining.


Theme 5: TCV’s “30-Year Survival Rule” and Investment Process

Jay Hoag shared the sources of TCV’s resilience since its founding in 1994, the evolution of its investment process, and its organizational culture.

  • Three pillars of survival: 1) Betting on technology; 2) Focusing on growth investing; 3) Being a “long-term patient investor” – all of which require “a lot of effort and a lot of luck.”
  • From cold calling to AI-driven screening: Early days involved cold calling by phone; automation began 12 years ago. Today, through a data intelligence group, TCV tracks 11 million technology companies (including employee growth, app downloads, product usage, etc.), with AI automatically scoring them.
  • Three-tier investment process: 1) Industry teams meet at least once a week; 2) Weekly global pipeline meeting; 3) An investment committee requiring unanimous agreement from three members – all votes must be yes. Each fund invests in only 20–25 companies, adding 6–10 new ones per year.
  • “Consensus vs. Non-consensus” quadrant: Non-consensus and correct investments tend to generate outsized returns. Jay Hoag himself is “more inclined to be aggressive,” willing to pay higher valuations for the best companies because “the best quality technology companies” can navigate any environment.

Deduction and Verification: TCV’s concentrated investment strategy demands a high hit rate but exposes the firm to the risk of failure in any single company. Signals to verify: the degree of disagreement within the investment committee and whether new investments consistently outperform the benchmark.


Stocks Mentioned

Position Analyst's View Key Data
Netflix Long-term hold, overweight TCV held 43% stake at IPO; market cap ~$480B in 2025; TCV led restructuring financing in 2001
Spotify Long-term hold No specific data given, but mentioned as a "legendary company"
Expedia Long-term hold Mentioned as a "legendary company", no specific data
Apple Case study (positive) "Declared dead" in 2000, today market cap exceeds $3 trillion
Microsoft Case study (positive) Investors "wandered in the wilderness" for over a decade, today market cap exceeds $3 trillion
NVIDIA Case study (scale) Market cap $2.8 trillion
Amazon Case study (scale) Market cap $2 trillion
Google Case study (scale) Market cap $2 trillion
Meta Case study (scale) Market cap $1.5 trillion
Stripe Case study (private market) Private tender offer, but no specific valuation given

Judgments Worth Remembering

1. (Jay Hoag)Consumer Internet is an opportunity within "endangered species" : While everyone is frantically chasing SaaS and AI, consumer internet has been forgotten. But the base of 5 billion smartphone users has not changed; new consumer franchises are bound to emerge. "I don't believe the white space has shrunk."

2. (Jay Hoag)Technology commercialization requires caution against "overestimating near-term, underestimating long-term" : Technologies like autonomous driving and AR/VR typically take a long time to go from "usable" to "commercialized." The key is "applicability" rather than "usability" — there must be a clear profit model and a defensible moat.

3. (Jay Hoag)Every great company goes through a "desert of disappointment" : Apple was declared dead in 2000, and Microsoft "wandered" in the eyes of investors for more than a decade. Linear growth is the exception, not the norm. Investors must be mentally prepared for "doubt and criticism."

4. (Jay Hoag)Growth investing is the "golden middle ground of risk-return" : Early-stage venture capital carries a 30-50% loss rate but pursues 50-100x returns; private equity relies on leverage and cost cutting. Growth investing steps in after technology risk is eliminated, offering low principal loss risk while capturing high growth.

5. (Jay Hoag)Non-consensus and correct: that is the source of excess returns : In the quadrant of consensus vs. non-consensus, being non-consensus and correct often generates the largest returns. But "if you are wrong and non-consensus, it's really bad."

6. (Jay Hoag)The "lifelessness" of the IPO market is temporary but puzzling : Historically, there were 50-60 tech IPOs per year, and now the market has been sluggish for the fourth year. Massive private capital ultimately needs to be returned, but the widely accepted "permanent private market" assumption may not hold.

7. (Jay Hoag)The "pyramid" framework for investing in companies : Modeled after John Wooden's "Pyramid of Success," the core is "preparation, diligence, perseverance." His definition of success is "doing your best to become the best version of yourself" — not comparing with others, not comparing with the market.

8. (Jay Hoag)"Survivorship bias" in founder selection : Founders of successful companies need to be "a little crazy" and cannot "moonlight" or pursue "work-life balance." TCV focuses on identifying franchises that can build dominant positions over the long term.