← Back to list
Colossus (Invest Like the Best / Business Breakdowns)Podcast28 Sep 2021Source: joincolossus.comHost: Patrick O'Shaughnessy

Jay Hoag - Calibrating Market Adoption - [Invest Like the Best, EP. 244]

In plain words

This interview covers Jay Hoag's growth-stage investing philosophy: swing less, pick better, and bet after tech risk is gone. He thinks the biggest mistake is believing big tech's best days are over—in 2005 only 1 of the top 10 global companies by market cap was tech; by end of 2020 it was 9, with combined value jumping from $300B to $9.5T. Key holdings: Netflix (he added when its stock fell 70% in 2011), Peloton (rejected by all other investors, but he likes its full-stack model), and Spotify (paid users listen over an hour daily). He also says the biggest opportunities often come from CEOs considered 'batshit crazy.'

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

At a Glance TCV co-founder Jay Hoag shared his investment philosophy and market insights on the podcast Invest Like the Best. His core argument is that excess returns are generated by reducing the frequency of bets and improving the average hit rate, while emphasizing the importance of evaluating th

~15 min full read · 8 sections
Deep Analysis

This Issue at a Glance

Jay Hoag, co-founder of TCV (Technology Crossover Ventures), brings nearly 40 years of technology investment experience, with a portfolio that includes giants such as Airbnb, Netflix, Peloton, and Zillow. The core theme of this episode is: generating excess returns in growth-stage investing by "reducing the number of bets and increasing the average hit rate", along with an in-depth exploration of how to evaluate early value propositions, identify "slightly crazy" visionary CEOs, and the unique advantages of crossover investing.

The most impactful judgment in the entire episode: Jay Hoag believes that "one of the biggest mistakes in tech history is thinking that the best days of big tech companies are behind them" — he points out that in 2005, only one of the world's top ten companies by market cap was a tech firm, while by the end of 2020, there were nine, with their combined market cap surging from $300 billion to $9.5 trillion; and the next cohort of companies set to join this club still has enormous runway ahead.


Theme 1: The "Low Loss Rate" Philosophy of Growth-Stage Investing — Fewer Swings, Higher Average Hit Rate

Jay Hoag argues that the high loss rate logic of early-stage venture capital does not apply to growth-stage investing. TCV's core strategy is to enter at a stage where "technical risk has been eliminated," with the primary task being to "calibrate market adoption."

  • Historical Context: In 1991, the entire venture capital industry raised less than $2 billion; TCV's first fund in 1995 was $100 million, initially assuming it would "always remain small." By 2021, the scale of the technology industry had expanded by several orders of magnitude.
  • Mechanism Breakdown: Hoag uses the early slang phrase "Is the dog eating the dog food?" as a metaphor for product-market fit. The core of growth-stage investing is determining whether a company is on a "growth path that can achieve scale" — where scale brings advantages such as moats and network effects. This should naturally result in a lower loss rate compared to early-stage venture capital.
  • Data Chain: In 1990, only 31 publicly listed technology companies had a market cap exceeding $1 billion, with another 13 valued between $500 million and $1 billion. In contrast, today's tech giants have market caps reaching the trillion-dollar level.
  • Extrapolation: Hoag emphasizes that "technology has historically been a story of a few huge winners and many losers, but over the past 10-15 years, it has shifted to a few absolutely massive winners and a batch of decent performers." Therefore, once a company capable of sustaining high growth over the long term is identified, there is no reason to rush to exit.

> Quote: "Within the investment world... there are many, many, many ways to generate returns. Deep value, buyouts with clever use of leverage, cost cutting, and many more. Early stage ventures would typically have a higher loss rate. What we've always done is growth stage."


Theme 2: Five Criteria for Evaluating "Magic Companies"—From Value Proposition to the Slightly Crazy CEO

Jay Hoag proposes five criteria for evaluating consumer technology companies, with the "slightly crazy" visionary CEO being the key variable.

1. Unique Value Proposition: The trinity of value + convenience + selection. Take Netflix as an example—during the DVD era, it offered unlimited rentals, delivery to your doorstep, and every DVD available, combining all three.

2. Extremely High User Engagement: Netflix users average 2 hours of daily viewing, while Spotify's paid users average over 1 hour per day.

3. Virtuous Cycle/Network Effects: Accelerates growth and builds a moat.

4. Exceptional Execution: Hoag cites Facebook vs. Twitter—both faced similarly sized opportunities, but Facebook's superior execution drove its revenue from $1.5 billion in 2010 to $86 billion in 2020, with a market cap of $1 trillion, while Twitter's market cap was only tens of billions, a gap of 15–20 times.

5. Slightly Crazy Visionary CEO: "The line between visionary genius and batshit crazy is not always clear, and it is very thin."

  • Historical Analogies: Brian Chesky (Airbnb—strangers staying in strangers' homes), Reed Hastings (Netflix—shifting from DVDs to streaming), Rich Barton (Expedia—putting travel agency mainframe systems onto NT servers), John Foley (Peloton—rejected by all investors).
  • Falsification Condition: If the idea is "too logical," it may not be an extraordinary opportunity. Truly big opportunities often lie in directions that seem "slightly crazy" but can be validated through trend lines (computing costs, storage costs, consumer behavior).

> Quote: "Almost to a person, the biggest technology successes were thought of as idiotic at the time or going after small prizes."


Theme 3: The Peloton Case — Why "Being Rejected by Everyone" Is Actually a Good Signal

Jay Hoag uses Peloton to illustrate: When a company is rejected by all investors, it often means it is doing something truly different.

  • Historical Context: Over the past 30 years, the home fitness space has been "littered with the corpses of failed companies" — home equipment is typically unused, and models like VHS fitness videos have all failed. Investors are pattern recognizers, and seeing "home fitness" automatically triggers associations with failure.
  • Mechanism Breakdown: John Foley's vision was to "own the entire ecosystem" — building hardware in-house, developing content in proprietary studios, hiring celebrity instructors, opening physical stores, and building an in-house delivery fleet. Early advice was to "license the software to other companies' equipment," but Foley insisted on controlling the entire chain to create a "magical user experience."
  • Data Chain: Peloton's most recent quarterly report shows subscribers complete an average of 20 workouts per month — extremely high engagement.
  • Inference: Hoag points out that as an investor, "sometimes you have to be willing to look like an idiot for a while." The biggest opportunities often come from contrarian bets. Readers should note this is a position-holder's perspective — Hoag uses Peloton's success to argue his investment philosophy, but Peloton experienced a significant stock price decline after 2021, which precisely illustrates the difficulty of "calibrating market acceptance."

Theme 4: The Unique Advantage of Crossover Investing — Private Market Information Empowering Public Market Judgments

Jay Hoag believes that investing in both private and public markets makes one better at both. The "C" in TCV stands for Crossover, which is part of its founding DNA.

  • Historical Context: Crossover investing was first practiced by Dave Bellet and Chet Suida of Citicorp in the 1960s. TCV adopted this as a core strategy when it was founded in 1995.
  • Mechanism Breakdown: Private market investments provide access to detailed trend information, company data, and competitive dynamics that public market investors typically cannot see. TCV has privately invested in approximately 400 companies, and this accumulated knowledge helps assess which companies can become giants with market capitalizations in the hundreds of billions or even trillions of dollars.
  • Key Case: In 2011, when Netflix's stock price fell by 70%, TCV aggressively bought in through a PIPE (Private Investment in Public Equity). Hoag emphasized: "You just need to be right in the long term; you can afford to be wrong in the short term." Netflix's stock price also fell 15-20% for six months after its IPO, which instead provided a good entry point.
  • Inference: A long-term perspective allows TCV to "filter out the noise" — a "bad quarter" does not mean a change in vision or strategy. Falsification Condition: If fundamentals genuinely deteriorate (rather than short-term volatility), the logic for long-term holding breaks down.

> Quote: "Even when you can see the mountaintop, it doesn't mean the path there is going to be an easy one. And relatedly, almost all great companies go through a desert of disillusionment."


Theme 5: Underestimated Runway — The Best Days for Tech Giants Are Far from Over

Jay Hoag believes the market's biggest mistake is assuming that big tech growth has peaked, while underestimating the potential scale of the next generation of technology companies.

  • Data Chain: In 2005, only 1 of the world's top 10 companies by market cap was a tech firm; in 2010, there were 3; by the end of 2020, there were 9. Their combined market cap surged from $300 billion to $9.5 trillion.
  • Mechanism Breakdown: These companies possess "the best business models on Earth"—extremely high user engagement, unprecedented profit margins and cash flow characteristics, and massive room for user growth. Hoag emphasizes: "Don't think it's unreasonable just because a tech company's market cap exceeds the combined value of three traditional firms—their growth prospects may indeed justify it."
  • Historical Analogy: In the year TCV was founded (1995), downloading the first piece of music took 90 minutes. Today, Spotify offers 40 million songs, accessible on a phone in under a second. Yet Spotify's 100 million+ paid users (2021 data) represent only a small fraction of the 4 billion global smartphone users.
  • Extrapolation: Hoag argues that the next batch of companies to join the trillion-dollar club will emerge from currently undervalued areas—including blockchain, next-generation fintech (e.g., New Bank, World Remit, Revolut, Trade Republic), and cloud computing/multi-cloud/open source/DevOps tools (e.g., Mambu, Redis, Spryker).

Mentioned Positions

Position Guest Stance Key Data
Netflix Bullish (long-term hold, added during 70% price drop in 2011) Average daily user watch time: 2 hours; 200M+ subscribers in 2021; IPO price dropped 15-20% for 6 months
Peloton Bullish (investment case, rejected by all other investors) Average 20 workouts per subscriber per month; built full chain of hardware/content/delivery in-house
Spotify Bullish (long-term hold) Paid users average over 1 hour daily usage; 40M songs; 100M+ paid users (2021)
Facebook Bullish (was a private investor) Revenue grew from $1.5B in 2010 to $86B in 2020; market cap $1 trillion
Twitter Neutral (comparison case) Successful but market cap only 1/15 to 1/20 of Facebook's
Expedia Bullish (early investor) Migrated travel agency mainframe system to NT servers
Zillow Bullish (early investor) Founded by Rich Barton
Airbnb Bullish (portfolio company) Once seen as a crazy idea of "strangers staying in strangers' homes"
New Bank Bullish (unlisted company) Next-generation fintech
World Remit Bullish (unlisted company) Next-generation fintech
Revolut Bullish (unlisted company) Next-generation fintech
Trade Republic Bullish (unlisted company) Next-generation fintech
Mambu Bullish (unlisted company) Cloud computing/DevOps tools
Redis Bullish (unlisted company) Cloud computing/DevOps tools
Spryker Bullish (unlisted company) Cloud computing/DevOps tools
DocuSign Not specified (only cited as industry trend example) Pandemic accelerated e-signature adoption
Zoom Not specified (only cited as industry trend example) Pandemic accelerated remote work adoption

Judgments Worth Remembering

1. "Swing less, improve average hit rate" (Jay Hoag) — The core of growth-stage investing lies in "calibrating market acceptance" after technical risk has been eliminated, which naturally entails a lower loss rate than early-stage venture capital. TCV's first fund was $100 million, initially assuming it would "always stay small," but the scale growth of the tech industry far exceeded expectations.

2. "The line between visionary genius and batshit crazy is very thin" (Jay Hoag) — The biggest tech successes were considered foolish at birth. Airbnb (strangers staying in strangers' homes), Netflix (shifting from DVDs to streaming), and Peloton (building a full-chain home fitness system) all fall into this category. Falsification condition: If an idea is "too logical," it may not be an extraordinary opportunity.

3. "Almost every great company goes through a desert of disillusionment" (Jay Hoag) — Facebook was abandoned by investors during its mobile transition, Netflix's stock fell 70% in 2011, and it also dropped 15-20% for six months after its IPO. Long-term investors should use these "noises" rather than be scared off by them.

4. "One of the biggest mistakes in tech history is believing that the best days of big tech companies are behind them" (Jay Hoag) — In 2005, only one tech company ranked among the global top 10 by market cap; by the end of 2020, there were nine, with total market cap rising from $300 billion to $9.5 trillion. Facebook, Google, and Microsoft possess "the best business models on Earth."

5. "Being rejected by all investors can be a good signal" (Jay Hoag) — Peloton was rejected by all investors because investors are pattern recognizers, associating "home fitness" with failures over the past 30 years. But Foley insisted on controlling the entire chain, creating a "magical user experience."

6. "Cross-investing makes both sides better" (Jay Hoag) — Private market investments yield detailed trend information, helping assess which companies can become $100 billion market cap giants; a long-term perspective (rather than quarterly thinking) allows TCV to buy against the grain during public market "bad news."

7. "Five criteria for evaluating consumer companies" (Jay Hoag) — Unique value proposition (value + convenience + selection), extremely high user engagement, virtuous cycle/network effects, exceptional execution, and a slightly crazy visionary CEO. The fifth criterion is the hardest to judge in advance but the most critical.

8. "Replace 'product-market fit' with 'is the dog eating the dog food?'" (Jay Hoag) — This early slang more intuitively captures the core of growth-stage investing: assessing whether a company is on a growth path that can scale, rather than merely looking for a "good product."