← Back to list
Hosking PartnersQuarterly30 Jun 2022Source: hoskingpartners.com

Q2 2022 – Quarterly Report Commentary

Hosking Partners is a London boutique founded in 2013 by Jeremy Hosking, a portfolio manager at Marathon Asset Management for over 25 years. It runs a single global equity strategy built on the capital-cycle, supply-side approach — contrarian, long-term, and unusually diversified (350+ holdings) under a multi-counsellor model, managing around $5.5bn.

Jeremy Hosking · 2013 · 伦敦Capital cycle / contrarian

In plain words

This report says markets are shifting from years of under-investment in energy and materials, which is good for the fund. Key holdings: JD.com and Alibaba were added to because Alibaba's stock fell 90% from its peak then rebounded over 70%, making it cheap. Cosmos Pharmaceutical, a Japanese drugstore chain, was bought for its low valuation and growth potential.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

At a Glance

One-sentence summary: The author believes the market is emerging from years of underinvestment and overly simplistic ESG policies, entering a multi-year capital reallocation process that benefits Hosking’s sector-tilted and capital-cycle-based portfolio strategy [Bullish].

  • Nearly all asset classes posted record negative returns in Q2 2022, with U.S. Treasuries recording their worst first-half performance since 1788 and the MSCI ACWI Index its worst since 1990.
  • The author argues that events such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict will not alter the trend but instead accelerate the new regime—Big Tech names like FAANG have capital expenditures exceeding $140 billion, while capital spending in the resources and energy sectors is near historic lows.
  • The fund added to positions in JD.com and Alibaba during the quarter. Alibaba’s EV/sales multiple has shrunk by 90% since its IPO, rebounding over 70% from its trough and entering deep value territory.
  • Japan became a key area of increased allocation, with the position rising from 3.2% at end-March to 4.3%. New positions included Cosmos Pharmaceutical (0.6x EV/sales), Bank of Kyoto, Aichi Bank, and Komatsu.
  • The materials sector was the largest drag (an ~11% allocation contributed roughly 180 basis points of underperformance), but materials companies are trading at historically low valuations—an average of 6x next year’s earnings, with Glencore’s spot free cash flow yield reaching 30%.
~11 min full read · 8 sections
Deep Analysis

Nearly All Asset Classes Posted Record Negative Returns This Quarter

Performance Comparison: In the quarter ending June 2022, nearly all asset classes recorded negative real returns, setting a historic record. Deutsche Bank estimates this was the worst first-half performance for U.S. Treasuries since 1788 and the worst first-half for equities in the MSCI ACWI Index since its inception in 1990. With inflation at a 40-year high and the Federal Reserve raising interest rates at the fastest pace since the early 1990s, the market is adapting to a new regime: sharply higher discount rates, persistent shortages in energy and commodities, and the risk of a central bank-induced recession. The author states, "market participants are understandably as bearish as at any time in the last decade," meaning current levels of bearishness among market participants are as high as any point in the past decade, which is understandable.

Capital Cycle Is Presenting Clear Opportunities

Market/Macro View [Bullish]: The author argues that events such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict are unlikely to alter trends but will instead reinforce existing dynamics—puncturing the bubbles of the previous cycle and accelerating the new regime. The key opportunity lies in sector capital cycles: "Big Tech" like FAANG spent over $140 billion on capital expenditures in 2021, while capital spending in the resources and energy sectors is near historic lows (measured by capex per unit of output). The author notes that increasing environmental and social constraints on miners and energy producers in recent years, combined with capital discipline imposed by shareholders, have compressed commodity supply to the point where prices clearly indicate actual shortages—especially in the energy sector. The author states, "Could it be that policy makers and asset allocators will look back on the past decade as an era characterised by a degree of naivety?" meaning policymakers and asset allocators may look back on the past decade and wonder if it was an era marked by a certain degree of naivety.

Energy Sector Contributed Gains, Materials Sector Was the Biggest Drag

Performance Comparison: An approximately 7% exposure to the energy sector contributed roughly 40 basis points of relative gains. However, high oil prices and Fed tightening weighed on economically sensitive areas: the financial sector, as the largest overweight, dragged performance by about 70 basis points; the materials sector, with an approximately 11% allocation, dragged performance by about 180 basis points, as copper, nickel, and zinc fell 20-25% during the quarter. The author believes that while short-term price volatility is difficult to predict, supply constraints, the energy transition, and net-zero commitments will support the pricing environment for these metals. China accounts for 50% of global commodity demand, and after two years of subdued economic activity, a reopening is unlikely to push commodity prices lower. Materials companies are trading at historically low valuations—an average of 6 times next year's earnings, with Glencore offering a spot free cash flow yield of 30%.

China Holdings Provided Positive Returns; Added to JD.com and Alibaba

Key Stocks: The fund's China holdings delivered positive absolute returns during the quarter. JD.com (Held/Observe): Attractive through a long-term mental model lens, outperforming the broader market after reporting sustained growth. Alibaba (Added): Its EV/sales multiple has contracted 90% since its listing, rebounding over 70% from its lows. The author believes "concerns over slowing growth and a regulatory crackdown put the shares into deep value territory." The fund took advantage of low prices during the quarter to add to both stocks.

Japan Became a Major Area of Addition; New Positions Including Cosmos

Position Moves:

  • Cosmos Pharmaceutical (New Position): A long-held "brand extinction" type investment, a founder-led drugstore supermarket chain using an Aldi-like model, where private-label products offer significant value to price-sensitive consumers. Its nationwide expansion in Japan is still in early stages, with growth potential not reflected in its 0.6x EV/sales multiple.
  • Bank of Kyoto (New Position): A low-valuation Japanese financial stock with notable activist investor involvement.
  • Aichi Bank (New Position): Same as above.
  • Komatsu (New Position): A construction machinery manufacturer with notable activist investor involvement.
  • BIMAS (Reduced): A Turkish discount retailer with a private-label model similar to Cosmos, up 10% in USD terms year-to-date; reduced to invest in Japanese peers.
  • Ford Motor Company (Exited): Exited to free up capital for investment in Japan.
  • Willis Towers Watson (Reduced): Partially trimmed.
  • Liberty Global (Reduced): Partially trimmed.
  • CBRE (Reduced): Partially trimmed.
  • Berkshire Hathaway (Reduced): Partially trimmed.
  • TSMC (Reduced): Partially trimmed.

Japan's allocation rose from 3.2% at the end of March to 4.3%. The fund's period-end cash weighting was approximately 4%, which the author states will provide opportunities to "be greedy when others are fearful."

Appendix: Position Moves Table

Position Action Key Data/Rationale
Cosmos Pharmaceutical New Position 0.6x EV/sales, early stage of Japan expansion
Bank of Kyoto New Position Low valuation, activist investor involvement
Aichi Bank New Position Low valuation, activist investor involvement
Komatsu New Position Activist investor involvement
JD.com Added Sustained growth, mental model perspective
Alibaba Added Rebound 70%+ from lows, deep value
BIMAS Reduced Up 10% in USD terms year-to-date
Ford Motor Company Exited Free up capital for Japan investment
Willis Towers Watson Reduced Partially trimmed
Liberty Global Reduced Partially trimmed
CBRE Reduced Partially trimmed
Berkshire Hathaway Reduced Partially trimmed
TSMC Reduced Partially trimmed

At a Glance

The report argues that the market is emerging from years of underinvestment and overly simplistic ESG policies, entering a multi-year process of capital reallocation that benefits Hosking's sector-skewed, capital cycle-led portfolio strategy. While the portfolio is sensitive to discounted changes in short-term demand expectations, long-term supply deficits in many areas are creating increasingly attractive positioning opportunities, and investors who stay the course will be rewarded.

  • Core Thesis: The report believes that years of underinvestment in productive assets, combined with overly simplistic ESG policies, have reset the forward return prospects for these assets. A "new chapter" is now beginning.
  • Strategy Positioning: The report emphasizes that it is likely in the early stages of this multi-year capital reallocation process, and the portfolio's sector-skewed and capital cycle-led methodology should be advantageous in this environment.
  • Risks and Opportunities: The report acknowledges that the portfolio is sensitive to discounted changes in short-term demand expectations (i.e., it could face pressure if a recession causes a sharp drop in demand). More critically, however, longer-term supply deficits in many areas constitute an "increasingly attractive setup," citing a Reuters report (Note 1) that the bond market experienced its "worst start in decades" in the first half of 2022, suggesting a fundamental shift in the return environment for traditional assets.
  • Direct Quote: "We are likely in the early stages of a multi-year process of capital reallocation, something that should play well to our sector-skewed portfolio and capital cycle-led approach."

Position Moves

Ticker Direction Author's One-Sentence View Key Data
Cosmos Pharmaceutical New Position A long-term "brand fade" investment, early in Japan expansion, value not yet reflected 0.6x EV/Sales
Bank of Kyoto New Position Low-valuation Japanese financial stock with activist investor involvement Not disclosed
Aichi Bank New Position Low-valuation Japanese financial stock with activist investor involvement Not disclosed
Komatsu New Position Construction machinery manufacturer with activist investor involvement Not disclosed
JD.com Added Attractive through a long-term mental model lens, outperforming the broader market Sustained growth
Alibaba Added Concerns over slowing growth and regulatory crackdowns have pushed it into deep value territory EV/Sales down 90% post-IPO, rebounded over 70% from lows
BIMAS Reduced Up 10% in USD terms year-to-date, reduced to invest in Japanese peers Up 10% in USD terms year-to-date
Ford Motor Company Exited Exited to recycle capital into Japan Not disclosed
Willis Towers Watson Reduced Partially trimmed Not disclosed
Liberty Global Reduced Partially trimmed Not disclosed
CBRE Reduced Partially trimmed Not disclosed
Berkshire Hathaway Reduced Partially trimmed Not disclosed
TSMC Reduced Partially trimmed Not disclosed