Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.
This report explains why Oakmark funds lost money in China in 2014 but sees it as a good opportunity. The manager thinks China's anti-corruption campaign (cracking down on corrupt officials) and reforms (like opening up energy and finance) are positive. They slow the economy short-term but shift it from investment-driven to consumer-driven growth, which is healthier. Markets are too pessimistic, making Chinese consumer stocks cheap. He sees this as a buying chance. Worth reading because it shows why slower growth can be good and how to find opportunities in change.
The Oakmark research article reviews global equity market performance in 2014, noting that both the Oakmark International and Oakmark International Small Cap Funds incurred losses. Key influencing factors include: a significant appreciation of the U.S. dollar (appreciating over 9% against the Austra
This chapter reviews the core reasons behind the losses of Oakmark International and Oakmark International Small Cap Funds in 2014, with a particular focus on the author’s observations following a visit to China/Hong Kong in December 2014. The market backdrop includes a significant appreciation of the US dollar, a sharp drop in oil prices, weak economic conditions in Europe, and ongoing anti-corruption efforts and reforms in China.
The author argues that China’s ongoing anti-corruption campaign and market-oriented reforms (such as deregulation in energy and financial services, and state-owned enterprise reforms) are positive and deep-seated, unlike the superficial changes seen over the past decade. Although these measures have led to short-term economic slowdown, they will, in the long run, shift China’s economy from an investment-driven model to a consumption-driven one, providing a more sustainable engine for global economic growth. The author believes that current market pessimism has led to an undervaluation of China’s consumption-related assets, creating significant investment opportunities for long-term investors.
Counterintuitive Judgment: The author views China’s economic slowdown (from high growth to medium pace) as a positive signal, indicating a more sustainable growth model rather than a crisis.
| Company/Asset | Role | Key Data | Bullish/Bearish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Suisse | Major European holding | Subject to intense regulatory actions | Neutral (factual statement) |
| BNP Paribas | Major European holding | Subject to intense regulatory actions | Neutral (factual statement) |
| Tesco | Sold position | Underperformance due to company-specific issues | Sold |
| Fugro | Holding | Underperformance due to company-specific issues | Neutral (factual statement) |
| China consumption-related companies (not specifically named) | Investment opportunity | Weak stock prices due to market pessimism | Bullish |
| Volvo / Air China / Chinese domestic diapers | Positive examples (hypothetical “good consumption”) | No specific data | Neutral (used to illustrate risk) |
| Louis Vuitton / BMW | Negative examples (hypothetical “bad consumption”) | No specific data | Neutral (used to illustrate risk) |