← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly31 Mar 2019Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark Fund: First Quarter 2019

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report looks at how the Oakmark Fund performed in early 2019. Since it started in 1991, it has averaged over 12% annual returns, which is solid. But in the past year, it only gained 0.66%, showing big short-term ups and downs. The fund's fees (expense ratio) are about 0.85%, which is reasonable and won't hurt long-term growth much. For regular investors, this fund could be a good choice if you plan to hold for years. But if you trade often, watch out for market swings and fees eating into your profits.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

The average annualized total return of the Oakmark Fund (Investor Class) as of March 31, 2019, is as follows: 12.36% since inception (August 5, 1991), 16.47% over the 10-year period, 8.13% over the 5-year period, 0.66% over the 1-year period, and 12.83% over the most recent 3 months. In terms of exp

~2 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This chapter focuses on the investment return performance and fee structure of the Oakmark Fund (Investor Class) as of March 31, 2019. By presenting annualized total returns across different time horizons, the report evaluates the fund's long-term and short-term performance, emphasizing the impact of fees on net returns.

Core Thesis

The report's core investment argument is that the Oakmark Fund has demonstrated solid long-term performance, with an annualized return of 12.36% since its inception in 1991. However, recent short-term returns have been notably volatile (only 0.66% over one year), warranting caution regarding short-term market risks. The expense ratio (gross 0.89%, net 0.85%) is at a moderate level, with a limited impact on long-term compounding, though the fee proportion may be amplified under high short-term volatility.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Strong Long-Term Performance: Since its inception (August 5, 1991), the fund has achieved an annualized return of 12.36%, with a 10-year annualized return of 16.47%, indicating the fund's ability to generate excess returns during prolonged bull markets.
  • Significant Short-Term Volatility: The one-year return is only 0.66%, but the fund rebounded 12.83% in the most recent three months, reflecting the sharp market fluctuations from late 2018 to early 2019.
  • Transparent Fee Structure: The gross expense ratio is 0.89%, and the net expense ratio is 0.85%, with a small difference, suggesting the fund has not significantly adjusted costs through fee waivers.

Comparative Data Table:

Time Horizon Annualized Total Return
Since Inception (August 5, 1991) 12.36%
10-Year 16.47%
5-Year 8.13%
1-Year 0.66%
Most Recent 3 Months 12.83%

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark Fund (Investor Class): The core fund analyzed in the report. Its role is that of an investment vehicle, with key data including long-term returns (12.36%), short-term volatility (1-year 0.66%), and expense ratios (0.89%/0.85%). The report does not explicitly take a bullish or bearish stance but implies through data that long-term holding value outweighs short-term trading.

Investment Implications

  • Long-Term Investors May Take Note: With an annualized return exceeding 12% since inception, the fund is suitable as a core allocation, though investors must accept short-term volatility (e.g., the one-year return of only 0.66%).
  • Short-Term Traders Should Exercise Caution: The 12.83% rebound in the most recent three months indicates rapid shifts in market sentiment, but the low one-year return highlights high market-timing risk, and the expense ratio (0.85%) will erode returns over short holding periods.
  • Limited Fee Impact: The net expense ratio of 0.85% is below the industry average (approximately 1%), making its effect on long-term compounding manageable. However, investors should compare fees with similar funds to optimize costs.