← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly30 Jun 2012Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark Fund: Second Quarter 2012

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report covers Oakmark Fund's performance through mid-2012. Since its launch in 1996, it has delivered a solid 12.17% annual return, but lost 3.46% in the latest three months—showing short-term ups and downs. For everyday investors, the key takeaway: long-term gains are possible, but you need to tolerate volatility. Also, the fund charges a 1.04% annual fee (like an expense), which slowly reduces your net returns. Worth reading because it reminds you to balance long-term hopes with short-term risks and costs.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

Oakmark Fund - Investor Class average annualized total returns as of June 30, 2012: since inception (November 1, 1996) 12.17%, 10-year 5.68%, 5-year 2.27%, 1-year 5.45%, and latest 3-month -3.46%. The report’s core argument emphasizes long-term investment value, though short-term performance is affe

~3 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section presents the performance data of the Oakmark Fund (Investor Class) as of June 30, 2012, covering return rates from the long term (since inception in 1996) to the short term (the latest three months), and discloses the expense ratio. This provides a foundation for evaluating the fund's investment value across different market cycles.

Core Viewpoint

The report's implicit core judgment is that the Oakmark Fund has achieved solid compounded returns over the long term (annualized 12.17% since inception in 1996), but has experienced a significant recent drawdown (-3.46% in the latest three months), indicating high short-term volatility. Investors need to focus on the balance between long-term returns and short-term risks, as well as the erosion of net returns by the expense ratio (1.04%).

Key Arguments and Data

  • Outstanding Long-Term Performance: From its inception on November 1, 1996, to June 30, 2012, the annualized total return reached 12.17%, significantly above the average market level over the same period.
  • Divergent Medium-Term Returns: The 10-year annualized return was 5.68%, and the 5-year return was 2.27%, indicating that market conditions over the past five years (such as the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent recovery) have pressured the fund's performance.
  • Weak Short-Term Performance: The 1-year return was 5.45%, but the 3-month return was -3.46%, suggesting that recent market volatility has driven down net asset value.
  • Cost of Fees: The total expense ratio is 1.04% (as of September 30, 2011), higher than some passive index funds, and must be factored into long-term return calculations.
Time Period Annualized Total Return
Since Inception (1996/11/01) 12.17%
10 Years 5.68%
5 Years 2.27%
1 Year 5.45%
3 Months -3.46%

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark Fund - Investor Class: The core fund analyzed in the report, with no specific holdings mentioned. The fund is managed by Harris Associates and is known for its value investing strategy.

Investment Implications

  • Long-Term Holders Should Assess Volatility Tolerance: Although long-term returns are impressive (12.17%), the -3.46% decline over the latest three months indicates the fund is not a low-volatility product; investors must evaluate their own risk tolerance.
  • Expense Ratio Is a Key Variable for Net Returns: The 1.04% expense ratio is moderate among actively managed funds, but its compounding effect over the long term can significantly impact final returns. It is advisable to compare with similar funds or low-cost index funds.
  • Short-Term Performance Is Not Predictive: The loss over the latest three months should not be overinterpreted as a trend reversal, but it is necessary to assess whether the fund's strategy remains suitable for the current cycle in light of market conditions (e.g., the 2012 European debt crisis and slowing U.S. economic recovery).