This piece covers investor Sarah Tavel's framework for marketplace and consumer social investing. She argues success isn't about GMV but finding a 'core action' that makes the product better with use and harder to leave—like pinning on Pinterest. She's bullish on DoorDash (started in suburbs to beat rivals), TikTok (participatory, not passive), and Recce (helps restaurants order supplies). She flags Postmates (spent big but didn't win) and LinkedIn (useless for some professions).
At a Glance Benchmark partner Sarah Tavel shared her core framework for consumer and marketplace investing on this episode of Invest Like the Best. She emphasized that the key to marketplace success lies in identifying and optimizing the "Core Action," citing Pinterest's early growth experience as a
Sarah Tavel, a general partner at Benchmark and former early product lead at Pinterest, systematically outlines a "three-tier framework" for marketplace investing—from launching a market, tilting it, to ultimately winning—and shares investment opportunities in the consumer social space. The most impactful takeaway from the entire episode: the key to marketplace success is not GMV growth, but identifying and optimizing the "Core Action"—an action that must simultaneously create "cumulative benefits" and "increasing costs of leaving"—making the product better the more users engage, while raising the stakes of walking away.
Sarah Tavel argues that the core of marketplace investing lies in understanding the complete path from launch to tilt to win, rather than blindly chasing growth.
Level 1: Launching the Marketplace
Level 2: Tilting the Marketplace
Level 3: Winning the Marketplace
> "When you go to a market, it has to feel 'alive.' And the only way to achieve that is through extreme focus." — Sarah Tavel, quoting Bill Gurley
Sarah Tavel is optimistic about consumer social, arguing that giants like Facebook, YouTube, and LinkedIn are being disrupted by newer, more vertical and participatory models.
Core Insight: Participation Outweighs Spectating
YouTube's Vulnerability
LinkedIn's "Identity Problem"
Sarah Tavel argues that every digital product has a "core action"—a single behavior that best predicts user retention while simultaneously creating network effects.
Three characteristics of a core action:
1. High retention predictability: Users who complete this action are highly likely to return
2. Creates network effects: Adds value to the system (e.g., Pinterest's "pin" enriches the discovery graph)
3. Generates "cumulative benefits and increasing switching costs": The more users engage, the better the product becomes; the greater the cost of leaving
Pinterest Case
Two test questions:
1. Would users say "the more I use the product, the better it gets"?
2. Would users say "the more I use it, the greater the loss if I leave"?
> "If you pass both tests, you have created a very sticky product." — Sarah Tavel
Counterexample: Anonymous social apps
Sarah Tavel argues that companies require different data strategies at different stages, and the biggest pitfall is chasing "empty calorie" metrics.
Three-Stage Data Strategy:
1. Early Stage (Finding Product-Market Fit): Data is not the guide — "rely on first principles and user research, rather than being dominated by dashboards"
2. Growth Stage: Build data muscle — shift from intuition-driven to data-driven
3. Scale Stage: Focus on a single key metric — "weekly active users for your core action, track trends by cohort, everything else is secondary"
The "Empty Calories" Trap
Sarah Tavel shared key lessons from navigating hypergrowth at Pinterest, emphasizing that "not everything always goes up and to the right."
"Veteran Smoking" Analogy
Organizational Restructuring Is a Necessary "Bone Reset"
Ignoring "Super User" Requests
Sarah Tavel introduced her investment in London-based Recce, demonstrating how "unlocking information" can create market opportunities.
The Founder's "Trade Secrets"
Market Opportunity
> "These are the 'unlocking information' marketplace platforms — they aren't necessarily transactional, but they make information that was once opaque transparent." — Sarah Tavel, citing Rich Barton (Zillow founder)
| Position | Analyst View | Key Data |
|---|---|---|
| DoorDash | Bullish (Case Study) | Started in the suburbs of San Francisco, eventually surpassed Grubhub in market share |
| Grubhub | Risk Warning | Once held 60% market share, lost its lead due to self-imposed limitations (only serving restaurants capable of self-delivery) |
| Postmates | Risk Warning | Invested heavily in San Francisco and New York but failed to gain a lead, only held market leadership in Los Angeles |
| Airbnb | Bullish (Case Study) | Ranked #1 in a16z Marketplace 100; surpassed VRBO/HomeAway through "supply of different atomic units" (private listings) |
| Hipcamp | Bullish (Investment Target) | Analogous to Etsy vs eBay—building differentiation in the "land leasing" vertical |
| Goat | Bullish (Case Study) | Solved eBay's trust issue through "authenticity verification," unlocking the sneaker market |
| Hold & Observe (Former Employer) | Core action (pinning) completion rate: 98% return within the following week; previously experienced a growth crisis after Facebook cut off traffic | |
| Recce | Bullish (Investment Target) | Double-digit market share in London, entering the restaurant supply chain market from the buyer side |
| Evernote | Risk Warning | Became "too heavy" with clunky collaboration features, challenged by Notion |
| Notion | Bullish (Case Study) | Challenged Evernote through better collaboration experience and low migration costs |
| TikTok | Bullish | Achieves high stickiness through "memetic" and participatory experience |
| Risk Warning | Not applicable to certain professions (e.g., real estate agents), suffers from an "identity problem" | |
| RigUp | Bullish (Case Study) | Creates rich profiles for workers, becoming their "LinkedIn" |
1. "The success of a marketplace platform is not GMV, but liquidity." (Sarah Tavel) — Postmates had massive GMV but failed to build true liquidity; DoorDash, starting in the suburbs, reached the network effect tipping point much faster.
2. "Core actions must simultaneously create cumulative gains and diminishing losses." (Sarah Tavel) — Pinterest's "pinning" lets users build increasingly valuable boards (cumulative gains), while leaving means losing a carefully curated collection (diminishing losses); anonymous apps have neither, so they cannot retain users.
3. "Veterans keep smoking when the bomb goes off." (Sarah Tavel) — After surviving several "life-or-death" moments, staying calm about non-fatal issues is a board member's greatest value; after Facebook cut off Pinterest's traffic, it took 6–9 months to find a new growth path.
4. "Build for the next 100 million users, not optimize for existing ones." (Sarah Tavel) — Pinterest's power users demanded "rearrange pins," but only 0.1% of users ever used it; the real bottleneck was the inability to search boards.
5. "If both tests pass — the product gets better the more you use it, and the loss of leaving grows — you've created stickiness." (Sarah Tavel) — Evernote once achieved this through its search function, but the product became "too heavy," giving Notion an opening.
6. "Restructuring is sometimes a necessary 'bone reset.'" (Sarah Tavel) — As teams grow, regular "defragmentation" is needed: which teams require too many cross-functional meetings? Where is communication breaking down?
7. "Unlocking information is the core value of a marketplace platform." (Sarah Tavel, quoting Rich Barton) — Zillow (housing information), OpenTable (reservation information), and Recce (supplier pricing information) all create value by making opaque information transparent.
8. "The essence of early-stage VC is 'adopting the founder's goals as one's own.'" (Sarah Tavel, citing Kant/Christine Korsgaard) — The core of the paper "Creating a Kingdom of Ends": a friend is "someone who takes your ends as their own," which is precisely the relationship between an early investor and a founder.