← Back to list
Colossus (Invest Like the Best / Business Breakdowns)Podcast9 Oct 2025Source: joincolossus.comHost: Colossus

Media M&A - [Business Breakdowns, EP.230]

In plain words

This episode breaks down how media M&A is fundamentally changing: fewer buyers (3-5 instead of 20), more customized deals, and value shifting to platforms like Google/Facebook/Amazon and independent creators. Blake Saunders says YouTube channels are at their cheapest now because brand advertisers finally want to buy ads there directly. Substack newsletters are acquisition targets—but buyers shouldn't move them off the platform. Sports rights (like UFC) are the only assets that can still command billion-dollar deals because they create 'appointment viewing.'

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

At a Glance This edition of Business Breakdowns features media investment banking expert Blake Saunders, who examines the landscape of media M&A transactions and market realities. The core thesis: as traditional media transitions to digital, high-quality content and intellectual property (IP) have b

~14 min full read · 8 sections
Deep Analysis

At a Glance

Blake Saunders, with nearly 20 years of experience in media investment banking, former partner at Methuselah Advisors, recently founded a new platform independently. The main theme of this issue: the landscape of media M&A deals is undergoing a fundamental reshaping—traditional distribution models are collapsing, the buyer base is fragmenting, and the transaction process is shifting from standardized auctions to customized matchmaking. The most significant judgment in the entire piece: Blake Saunders argues that "the value of media assets is increasingly concentrating toward a few platforms (Google, Facebook, Amazon) and independent content creators at both ends, while traditional media companies in the middle face structural contraction, and this trend is irreversible."


I. Buyer Landscape in Media M&A: From 20 Buyers to 3-5

Blake Saunders argues that the "broad-net auction" approach to traditional media M&A is no longer viable, with the buyer pool sharply narrowing and becoming highly fragmented.

  • Historical Context: Over the past 25 years, the internet has turned media entrepreneurship into an arbitrage game of "scale up fast → sell out." In contrast, earlier newspapers and television were held by families for generations, and the federal government even prohibited cross-media monopolies within the same market. Today, Google and Facebook have absorbed the majority of advertising revenue, eroding the moats of traditional media.
  • Mechanism Breakdown: The standard process for sellers—where junior analysts send asset materials to 30 potential buyers, receive 5-15 bids, and select a winner after two rounds of screening—no longer applies. Blake notes: "Selling a media company or media-related business now requires a more customized, hands-on process. There are typically only 3-5 buyers, and you must directly communicate the value proposition."
  • Buyer Type Differentiation:
  • Traditional Media Groups: Such as Bloomberg and CNN, are "slowly following" new platforms (Substack, YouTube), but their pace is sluggish, and they are often harmed by shifting platform strategies (e.g., Facebook ending a video partnership after one year).
  • Non-Media Enterprises: For example, Uber might acquire a B2B media outlet serving its driver base, and cosmetics companies have attempted to buy YouTube channels—but "most non-media companies cannot operate media assets effectively."
  • Family-Controlled Buyers: Some family businesses "do not care about price" and make acquisitions directly on orders from the top, but such buyers are extremely rare.

Extrapolation and Signals: Blake predicts a wave of M&A in Substack and YouTube channels—"Looking back, now may be the cheapest time to buy a YouTube channel." However, each asset must be evaluated individually and cannot be generalized.


2. Scarcity of Content IP: Sports Rights and "Appointment Viewing" Assets

Blake Saunders argues that truly valuable long-term IP is extremely scarce, with the core criterion being whether it can generate "appointment viewing" behavior—sports rights are the heaviest asset in this category.

  • Data chain: The total distribution network for U.S. cable television has declined from 110 million households 7-8 years ago to 55 million today, with the halving of subscriber numbers directly leading to a halving of subscription fee revenue. Most value is concentrated in the hands of Google, Facebook, and Amazon.
  • Mechanism breakdown: Blake uses an "American diet" analogy—platforms make low-quality content highly addictive (e.g., UGC), much like fast food; while premium IP (e.g., South Park, UFC) is "healthy food from the farmers' market." Paramount's strategy is no longer to obsess over which platform hosts the content, but to first lock in the target audience, then buy what they are already watching—South Park (seasons 21-22 still retain cultural influence) and UFC (the first major sports event to restart during the pandemic) are typical examples.
  • Reimagining the IP library: Blake notes that most people overestimate the value of an IP library—"In most content formats, the first 30-60 days generate all the value, after which it decays sharply." However, technology is changing this: the music industry has revived revenue from old song catalogs thanks to streaming services like Spotify; a similar logic can apply to TV, film, and book libraries—using AI and low-cost production to reimagine old stories, much like Disney recoloring old movies. "Imagine if you didn't have to hire actors, just a kid sitting behind a keyboard. "

Inference and signals: Sports rights are the only area capable of generating "billion-dollar M&A or rights deals." UFC is categorized under "appointment viewing," alongside South Park. Falsification condition: if new content cannot gain breathing room within 2-3 seasons (most current series are canceled after one season), it will be difficult to accumulate long-term IP value.


3. Shift in Platform Distribution Strategy: YouTube from "Secondary Window" to "Premiere Platform"

Blake Saunders observes that traditional media companies are rethinking YouTube—transitioning from a secondary distribution channel for "shoulder content" to a premiere platform, as brand advertisers are finally willing to purchase directly on YouTube just like buying TV ads.

  • Mechanism Breakdown: Traditional TV sells "adjacency"—brands care about whether the ad content matches the tone of the program. The business model of Hot Ones (a popular interview show where guests eat spicy chicken wings) is: bulk-purchase ad inventory from YouTube, then resell it at a higher price to brands like P&G and Coca-Cola, promising "your ad will appear next to these two guests." Blake notes: "Hot Ones can sell ads like TV, which is why it commands a high multiple."
  • Historical Context: In the past, media companies treated YouTube as a "second window," using clips to lure viewers back to TV. Now they realize they should "create content for YouTube." CNN, Bloomberg, and others are also increasing investment in newsletters (Substack), following a similar logic—the platform itself is not the enemy but a channel to reach audiences.
  • Key Distinction: Blake emphasizes that media companies acquire "audiences," not "platforms." A newsletter with 50,000 highly engaged subscribers and an asset with the same audience but five zero-engagement channels attached have little difference in valuation. "What they want to know is: if we layer on our own growth capabilities and ad sales capabilities, can we bring value back to the entire platform?"

Deductions and Signals: High-quality newsletters on Substack will become M&A targets, but the mistake would be if buyers are "stupid enough to take it off the platform." Falsification condition: if platforms (YouTube, Substack) change algorithms or revenue-sharing rules, the value of media assets relying on their distribution will be impacted.


4. The Rise of Independent Content Creators: From "Polished Perfection" to "Authenticity as Value"

Blake Saunders argues that independent content creators are the biggest winners in the current media ecosystem—they no longer need the "seal of approval" from a Netflix special, monetizing directly through brand partnerships and their own products.

  • Data & Analogy: Oprah once had to change her name to "fit the mold"; today, 21-year-old streamers like Kai Cenat "do whatever they want"—his highest-viewed livestream featured "a mouse running into the room, and he was terrified." Blake notes: "This gives the younger generation an opportunity: you don't have to live perfectly. "
  • Mechanism Breakdown: The advantage of independent creators lies in authenticity and trust—qualities that become even scarcer in the AI era. They can simultaneously maintain multiple revenue streams, including brand sponsorships, proprietary products, and offline events, without being affected by CPM (cost per thousand impressions) fluctuations. "A 200-300 person event might cost a brand a few thousand dollars; the same number of people visiting a webpage would only generate $10. "
  • Relationship with Platforms: Blake advises independent media companies to "stay in your lane"—cross-platform expansion requires different content strategies and dedicated personnel, not simple copy-pasting. Offline events are an exception, as their revenue logic is decoupled from advertising.

Extrapolation & Signals: Blake concludes that "there have never been so many independent bookstores and independent comedians." The winners are creators who can build "true fans"—when a streamer causes a stir on the streets of New York, that's "pure signal: they have real fans." Falsification condition: if platforms significantly increase revenue cuts or restrict creators' monetization methods, the independent model will come under pressure.


5. The Economic Impact of AI: An Underestimated Structural Shock

Blake Saunders holds a pessimistic view on the economic consequences of AI, arguing that society severely underestimates its impact on the employment base and the tax system.

  • Core Argument: Society is fragile—during COVID, infection rates of just a few percentage points led to a complete lockdown. AI does not need to replace the majority of jobs; it only needs to affect "a few percentage points" of key positions (such as truck drivers and Uber drivers) to force a fundamental restructuring of the tax system.
  • Data Chain: The actual working population in the U.S. is far below 300 million, and the taxpaying population is even smaller. If AI causes a contraction in the income base, capital gains taxes and unrealized asset taxes (the "Elon Musk tax") will become inevitable. "You will see pension clawbacks and asset taxes introduced in Europe."
  • Counterintuitive Judgment: Blake refutes the optimistic narrative of "more free time → more creativity"—"We have more free time than at any point in history, yet most people are glued to their phones, more anxious, have fewer friends, less sex, and are fatter than ever before." AI will only exacerbate addiction, not alleviate it.
  • Extrapolation: The world will become deflationary—business-class tickets will be cheap enough to "buy at will," but most people will rely on government handouts (UBI) to live, while those who create assets will enjoy the freedom to "do whatever they want." Blake's response: "You must become a creator of economic value; you cannot just be an employee."

Falsification Condition: If the efficiency gains from AI can significantly reduce government spending (e.g., autonomous driving reducing traffic accidents, AI teaching lowering education costs), it could partially offset the tax pressure. However, Blake believes such optimism lacks historical evidence.


Mentioned Positions

Position Guest Sentiment Key Data
Substack Bullish (more M&A targets emerging) Bloomberg and CNN have announced increased investment; Blake believes "moving away from Substack is foolish"
YouTube Bullish (traditional media shifting to premiere platform) Hot Ones achieved a high-multiple sale by buying back inventory and reselling ads
Paramount Neutral (strategic pivot reasonable but uncertain) Heavy investment in South Park and UFC; cable TV subscribers dropped from 110 million to 55 million
South Park Bullish (scarce IP) Seasons 21-22 still culturally influential, classified as "appointment viewing" content
UFC Bullish (appointment viewing + earliest restart during pandemic) Rapidly resumed operations during the pandemic, regarded as a "billion-dollar" asset
New York Times Neutral (in transition) Shifting to subscription-driven model, but organic search traffic faces double-digit decline
New York Post Risk warning Organic search traffic dropped significantly; Blake believes it is "relatively resilient but still under pressure"
Barstool Sports Neutral (case study reference) Dave Portnoy stepped back as CEO but still drives most engagement; TCG investment case
Mr. Beast (Jimmy) Bullish (transcending YouTube) Raising funds around brands like Feastables, seen as "more than just a YouTube channel"
Hot Ones Bullish (replicable business model) Buys back inventory from YouTube and resells ads, selling "adjacency" like television
Axios Neutral (strong event model) Events attract 500 attendees, driving live engagement through "breaking news"
Kara Swisher / Code Conference Bullish (editor-led events) Once facilitated Bill Gates and Steve Jobs sharing the stage, representing a "cultural moment"
Sinclair (RSNs) Risk warning Restructured after acquiring regional sports networks; some rights have returned to the market
The Economist Risk warning (case study) Podcast audience dropped 85% after introducing a paywall
Spotify Neutral (technology empowerment case) Streaming revived royalty income from older songs, improving future revenue visibility

Judgments Worth Remembering

1. Blake Saunders: "Now might be the cheapest time to buy a YouTube channel." — Rationale: Traditional media companies have just realized YouTube should be a first-run platform rather than a secondary window, and brand advertisers are finally willing to buy YouTube ad inventory directly; however, each channel must be evaluated individually and cannot be generalized.

2. Blake Saunders: "In most content formats, the first 30-60 days generate all the value, after which it decays sharply." — Rationale: The value of IP libraries is generally overestimated; but technology (AI, streaming) is changing this—the music industry has revived old-song copyrights thanks to Spotify, and a similar logic can apply to film and book libraries.

3. Blake Saunders: "Media companies are buying 'audiences,' not 'platforms.'" — Rationale: A newsletter with 50,000 highly engaged subscribers and an asset with the same audience but five zero-engagement channels attached have little difference in valuation; buyers care about "whether we can amplify value by layering on our capabilities."

4. Blake Saunders: "Non-media companies cannot operate media assets." — Rationale: Cosmetics companies that rushed into YouTube channels a decade ago mostly failed; media operations require unique editorial judgment, audience understanding, and content rhythm that cannot be easily replicated.

5. Blake Saunders: "AI doesn't need to replace many jobs—just affecting a few percentage points of employment will force a fundamental restructuring of the tax system." — Rationale: During COVID, only a few percentage points of infection rates led to full lockdowns; if truck drivers and Uber drivers are replaced, capital gains taxes and unrealized asset taxes will become inevitable.

6. Blake Saunders: "More free time won't bring more creativity—we are more idle than at any point in history, yet more anxious, fatter, and with fewer friends." — Rationale: AI will only worsen addiction; society needs to actively "disconnect" rather than "connect more."

7. Blake Saunders: "Sports rights are the only area that can generate billion-dollar M&A or rights deals." — Rationale: UFC and South Park are classified as "appointment viewing" assets; cable TV subscribers have dropped from 110 million to 55 million, but the irreplaceability of live sports keeps their value intact.

8. Blake Saunders: "Independent content creators are the biggest winners in the current media ecosystem." — Rationale: Oprah had to change her name back then to "fit the template"; today, a 21-year-old streamer's live broadcast of "a mouse running into the room" becomes the highest-rated show; authenticity and trust are becoming even scarcer in the AI era.