← Back to list
Hosking PartnersQuarterly30 Sep 2024Source: hoskingpartners.com

Q3 2024 – Quarterly Report Commentary

Hosking Partners is a London boutique founded in 2013 by Jeremy Hosking, a portfolio manager at Marathon Asset Management for over 25 years. It runs a single global equity strategy built on the capital-cycle, supply-side approach — contrarian, long-term, and unusually diversified (350+ holdings) under a multi-counsellor model, managing around $5.5bn.

Jeremy Hosking · 2013 · 伦敦Capital cycle / contrarian

In plain words

This report says the fund manager believes the US economy has achieved a soft landing (rate cuts without a recession), and markets will revert to normal, moving away from just a few mega-cap stocks. They favor cheap cyclical stocks and real assets, like platinum miners (just visited South Africa, see a bottom), Japanese mid-caps (bought on dips), and new holdings Wise (cross-border payments) and Loma Negra (Argentine cement). They warn that mega-caps like Microsoft and Nvidia are overvalued and face antitrust risks.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

At a Glance

One-sentence summary: The author believes a soft landing has been achieved, and markets will revert to the mean. The strategy provides a margin of safety through low valuations and an overweight in cyclical sectors. [Cautiously Optimistic]

  • Net return for the quarter was 4.1%, underperforming the benchmark by 2.5 percentage points, with Japanese mid-cap stocks contributing approximately 40 basis points of excess return.
  • New positions were initiated in Wise, Centrica, and Loma Negra, while Wesco and Flex LNG were closed. The strategy also increased holdings in the platinum group metals basket and several Japanese companies.
  • The platinum group metals industry is viewed as a capital cycle bottom opportunity. The author recently returned from a site visit in South Africa and plans to publish a detailed report.
  • The strategy trades at a forward P/E of 12.4x (benchmark: 19.4x) and a P/B of 1.4x (benchmark: 3.2x), with a significant underweight in the U.S. (40.1% vs. 64.2%).
  • Citing Hegel and Stein's Law, the author warns that short-term extrapolation will eventually give way to long-term mean reversion, and mega-cap valuations face antitrust risks.
~11 min full read · 8 sections
Deep Analysis

Underperformed the Benchmark by 2.5 Percentage Points This Quarter, with Japanese Mid-Cap Stocks Contributing Excess Returns

Performance Comparison: In the third quarter of 2024, the Hosking Partners strategy delivered a net return of 4.1%, underperforming the benchmark's 6.6%. Over the past 12 months, the net return was 27.9%, compared to the benchmark's 31.8%. Performance was strong in July and September, but overall results were dragged down by market turmoil in August. The author stated, "recessionary fears translated into weaker performance during the month as a result of its exposure to more cyclical sectors such as financials, resources and energy," meaning recession concerns led to weaker performance for the strategy during the month due to its overweight in cyclical sectors like financials, resources, and energy. The Japanese market contributed approximately 40 basis points of relative excess returns, as gains from a diversified selection of mid-cap stocks offset weakness in large-cap export and financial stocks. The strategy's allocation to Japan stood at 13.5%, significantly overweighting the benchmark's 5.0%.

Stock-Level Contributions: CBRE, Qantas, Suncorporation, and 3i Led Gains

Itemized Commentary:

  • CBRE (Held on Watch): The Federal Reserve's easing policies alleviated concerns in the real estate market, driving the stock price higher.
  • Qantas (Held on Watch): Reported strong earnings for fiscal year 2024, boosting performance.
  • Suncorporation (Held on Watch): Pressure from activist investors led the market to recognize the value of non-core subsidiaries.
  • 3i (Held on Watch): The continued expansion of the Action retail business validated the investment thesis.
  • Underweight in Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, and Amazon (Not Explicitly Stated): These index heavyweights underperformed during the quarter, and the underweight position contributed positively.

Negative Contributions: Memory Semiconductors and Energy Stocks Dragged Performance

Itemized Commentary:

  • Micron, SK Hynix, Samsung (Held on Watch): Market concerns that the tailwinds from AI spending would be short-lived were strongly refuted by the companies themselves.
  • Occidental, ConocoPhillips (Held on Watch): Concerns in the energy market led to weak stock prices.
  • Noble, Seadrill, Valaris (Held on Watch): Oil drilling companies declined due to energy market impacts.
  • Hafnia, International Seaways (Held on Watch): Tanker companies also underperformed.

The strategy's energy allocation was approximately 12.6%, significantly higher than the benchmark's 4.0%. The author noted that the energy sector is currently trading at record-high normalized free cash flow yields (according to Empirical Research Partners data).

New Positions in Wise, Centrica, and Loma Negra; Increased Holdings in Platinum Group Metals and Japanese Companies

Itemized Commentary:

  • Wise (New Position): A cross-border payment processor benefiting from economies of scale.
  • Centrica (New Position): An energy utility company.
  • Loma Negra (New Position): A leading cement producer in Argentina.
  • Platinum Group Metals Basket (Impala, Anglo American Platinum, Northam, Sibanye Stillwater, Sylvania) (Increased Position): Viewed as a capital cycle bottom opportunity, currently representing approximately 1% of the strategy.
  • Japanese Companies (Nomura, SMFG, Hikari Tsushin, Nippon TV, Toyota Motor and Industries, Tosei, Dai Nippon) (Increased Position): Added to positions following the weakness after the August stock price decline.
  • Wesco (Liquidated): Poor execution.
  • Flex LNG (Liquidated): LNG carrier vessels are nearing delivery.
  • Microsoft, Alphabet, JP Morgan, Costco, Elevance, Nvidia, Micron, etc. (Reduced Position): Portfolio adjustments were made.

Platinum Group Metals Industry: Upside Opportunity at the Capital Cycle Bottom

Thesis (Bullish): The platinum group metals industry is a classic example of high exit barriers. Unsustainably low returns will ultimately lead to industry consolidation and capacity rationalization, presenting exciting upside opportunities. Evidence: The author recently returned from an investment trip to South Africa, visiting Sibanye Stillwater's Rustenburg platinum mine, and plans to publish a detailed report on the industry's capital cycle. Risk: The industry currently faces oversupply and low prices, but the author views this as a sign of a bottom.

Market Outlook: Soft Landing Achieved, Markets to Mean-Revert

Stance [Cautiously Optimistic]: The author believes that the debate over whether the Federal Reserve could achieve a "soft landing" since US interest rates peaked in August 2023 has been resolved — "it appears we are already in such a soft landing." This marks the first time since 1994 that the Fed has eased policy without a recession. China launched a $560 billion stimulus package, and global equity market capitalization is poised to surpass the October 2021 highs (according to Bank of America data). However, the author, citing Hegel and Stein's Law, reminds that short-term extrapolation will eventually give way to long-term mean reversion. Difference from Consensus: The author believes the market will gradually recognize the extent of "stretched elasticity" — UBS Holt notes that the concentration of market capitalization and value creation among mega-cap stocks is at its highest since the 1970s, while Bank of America states that 43% of the S&P 500's market cap is under antitrust investigation. Capital cycle analysis suggests that if these companies' moats are weakened, valuations will face downside.

Strategy Valuation Provides a Margin of Safety, Awaiting "Real Asset" Opportunities

Thesis (Bullish): The strategy is currently 24.1% underweight the US (40.1% vs. 64.2%), but nine of the top ten holdings are US-listed (except for Europe's 3i). The overall strategy trades at a forward P/E of 12.4x (benchmark: 19.4x) and a P/B of 1.4x (benchmark: 3.2x), offering a significant margin of safety. Evidence: The strategy is overweight the materials sector (approximately 13.5% vs. benchmark 4.1%), while investor allocation to commodities is at its lowest since June 2017 (according to Northern Trust). The author argues that deglobalization, nearshoring, net-zero emissions, and inflationary pressures will drive demand for "real assets." Risk: The effectiveness of China's stimulus is uncertain — the author stated, "We shall wait to see whether the recent China stimulus results in a temporary sugar rush for the market... or has a more concrete impact," meaning we will observe whether the stimulus provides a temporary boost or has a more tangible impact on economic growth. The strategy has indirect exposure to China through an overweight in Hong Kong (2.1% vs. 0.5%) and an overweight in materials, but remains offshore.


Position Moves

Ticker Direction Author's One-Sentence View Key Data
Wise New Position A cross-border payment processor benefiting from economies of scale; bullish on its business model. None
Centrica New Position An energy utility company; bullish on its defensive characteristics. None
Loma Negra New Position Argentina's leading cement producer; bullish on emerging market opportunities. None
Platinum Group Metals Basket (Impala, Anglo American Platinum, Northam, Sibanye Stillwater, Sylvania) Increased Position Viewed as a capital cycle bottom opportunity; oversupply and low prices signal a trough. ~1% of strategy
Nomura Increased Position Capitalizing on weakness after the August share price decline to add to Japanese companies. None
SMFG Increased Position Same as above. None
Hikari Tsushin Increased Position Same as above. None
Nippon TV Increased Position Same as above. None
Toyota Motor and Industries Increased Position Same as above. None
Tosei Increased Position Same as above. None
Dai Nippon Increased Position Same as above. None
Wesco Closed Position Poor execution; abandoned the position. None
Flex LNG Closed Position LNG carriers nearing delivery; outlook uncertain. None
Microsoft Reduced Position Position adjustment; underweight contributed positively. None
Alphabet Reduced Position Same as above. None
JP Morgan Reduced Position Same as above. None
Costco Reduced Position Same as above. None
Elevance Reduced Position Same as above. None
NVIDIA Reduced Position Same as above. None
Micron Reduced Position Same as above. None
CBRE Hold & Watch Fed easing policy alleviates real estate market concerns; stock price rose. None
Qantas Hold & Watch Strong FY2024 earnings drove performance. None
Suncorporation Hold & Watch Activist investor pressure; market recognizes value of non-core subsidiaries. None
3i Hold & Watch Action retail business continues to expand, validating the investment thesis. None
Micron Hold & Watch Market fears AI spending tailwinds are short-lived; company strongly refutes. None
SK Hynix Hold & Watch Same as above. None
Samsung Hold & Watch Same as above. None
Occidental Hold & Watch Energy market concerns lead to weak stock price. Energy positions account for ~12.6% of strategy
ConocoPhillips Hold & Watch Same as above. Same as above
Noble Hold & Watch Oil drilling company declines due to energy market impact. Same as above
Seadrill Hold & Watch Same as above. Same as above
Valaris Hold & Watch Same as above. Same as above
Hafnia Hold & Watch Tanker company also underperforms. Same as above
International Seaways Hold & Watch Same as above. Same as above