Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.
This is a letter from Oakmark's fund manager to investors in late 2013. His main point: ignore scary headlines about Europe and China, and focus on whether stocks are cheap and businesses are solid. He loaded up on European banks and Japanese stocks because they were undervalued. When Japan's market surged 80%, he cut back because prices outpaced company value. He also highlights Japanese corporate reforms—Olympus added independent directors and promised better shareholder returns. Takeaway for regular investors: don't panic over macro news; look for quality companies at good prices.
The Oakmark International Fund and Oakmark International Small Cap Fund performed well in 2013, despite a slight relative weakness in the fourth quarter. The report's theme centers on evaluating investment attractiveness through two key variables: company valuation and business quality. The core arg
This chapter discusses the investment performance and strategy of the Oakmark International Fund in 2013. The market environment was filled with negative "macro noise," including Europe's structural crisis, slowing growth in emerging markets, and uncertainty over Japan's reform prospects. The author's core stance is to ignore macro noise and focus on two variables—company valuation and business quality—to assess investment attractiveness.
The author argues that at the beginning of 2013, European and Japanese stock markets offered extreme value, leading the fund to overweight these two regions while underweighting emerging markets (deemed lacking in value). Although the overweight position in the European financial sector was controversial at the time (with the market generally believing that the eurozone's fiscal issues were far from resolved), the slow economic recovery in Europe and Japan's efforts to tackle deflation drove a market rebound, benefiting the fund. By the end of 2013, as Japanese stock prices rose far faster than corporate value creation, the fund had shifted to an underweight position in the Japanese market.
| Company/Asset | Role | Key Data | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olympus | Fund holding | Board has introduced numerous independent external directors; management aims to improve operational returns and restore shareholder cash returns | Bullish (positive case of governance improvement) |
| Japan Topix Index | Market benchmark | Rose approximately 80% from its 2012 low | Underweighted by year-end (price gains too rapid) |
| European Financial Sector | Fund overweight sector | Overweight position was "measurable" | Bullish (despite market controversy, supported by slow European economic recovery) |