← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly30 Jun 2025Source: oakmark.com

Uncertainty has a price | Fixed income market commentary 2Q 2025

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report argues that uncertainty doesn't necessarily mean lower returns. Using a card game analogy, it shows that a wider range of outcomes can actually have a higher expected value. In April, bond prices fell sharply even though many companies' fundamentals hadn't worsened. That overreaction created buying opportunities. Historically, when high-yield credit spreads (the extra yield over safe bonds) exceed 450 basis points, future 12-month returns have been well above average. For ordinary investors, the lesson is: don't flee the market just because of uncertainty. As long as bonds don't default, lower prices automatically mean higher future yields. Focus on whether the price already reflects the fear.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

Oakmark’s second-quarter 2025 fixed income market commentary notes that uncertainty itself is neither inherently good nor bad for the long-term value of assets; the key lies in whether the market has mispriced that uncertainty. The report’s core argument is that uncertainty carries a cost but also a

~3 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This chapter discusses the market's common misunderstanding of "uncertainty." The report points out that the current market is rife with panic narratives about tariffs, geopolitical conflicts, and fiscal deterioration. However, the author argues that uncertainty itself does not equate to lower expected returns; the key lies in whether the market has mispriced this uncertainty.

Core Views

  • Uncertainty does not equal lower expected returns: The author uses a card game analogy—Version A (narrow range, expected value $5) versus Version B (wide range, expected value $5.50)—to illustrate that a wider range of outcomes does not necessarily mean lower expected returns; it may even increase them.
  • Market overreactions create opportunities: Credit spreads widened sharply in April, but the fundamentals of many issuers did not deteriorate in tandem. The author believes that asset prices have been "over-discounted," and what is being bought at this point is "mispriced probabilities," not certainty.
  • Behavioral biases lead to missed opportunities: Investors avoid risk due to fear of losses, but historical data shows that when high-yield spreads exceed 450 basis points, the 12-month forward returns significantly exceed the long-term average. Staying invested is more important than market timing.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Card game analogy: Version A (four 4s, two 5s, four 6s) has an expected value of $5; Version B (one of each from 1 to 10) has an expected value of $5.50. The range widens, but the expected value is higher.
  • April actions: During the reporting period, the report increased credit risk exposure by 12 percentage points, on the grounds that the market offered better compensation for the same risk.
  • Historical patterns: Since COVID, every time high-yield spreads have broken through 450 basis points, the 12-month forward returns have significantly exceeded the long-term average. The author emphasizes that at such times, fear overrides facts, but bond mathematics dictates that when prices fall, yields automatically rise (as long as no default occurs).
Scenario Spread Level Historical 12-Month Return Performance
High-yield spread > 450bps Panic peak Significantly exceeds long-term average
Normal period Below 450bps Reverts to mean

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Domestic cruise company: Valuation implies a sharp slowdown, but the business model is protected (not specifically named).
  • Auto ABS transaction: Credit enhancement has improved, offering relatively safe high yields.
  • U.S. private aircraft manufacturer: Strong forward visibility, less affected by tariff pressures.
  • Other issuers: Assets insulated from tariff pressures.

Investment Implications

  • Do not exit the market due to uncertainty: The report argues that when credit spreads widen and prices fall, if fundamentals have not deteriorated proportionally, expected returns actually rise. Investors should focus on whether "prices have already reflected the fog," rather than trying to predict the future.
  • Capitalize on market overreactions: The volatility in April provided buying opportunities, especially for assets whose fundamentals remain unchanged but whose prices were depressed by panic. The author explicitly states that they are not buying certainty, but rather "mispriced probabilities."
  • The uniqueness of fixed income: Bond coupons and maturities are fixed, so price declines directly push up yields. Therefore, staying invested during panic periods is even more critical in fixed income than in equities—as long as no default occurs, returns mathematically must rise.