Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.
This report explains how Oakmark International Fund navigated the first quarter of 2026. The managers argue that markets are driven by short-term fears and headlines, not company fundamentals. So they're buying high‑quality businesses whose stocks have been unfairly punished—for example, enterprise software firms like SAP and Dassault Systèmes (which makes 3D design software) are cheap because investors worry AI will replace them; but the fund says these firms have unique, hard‑to‑copy “moats” and AI is more likely to help than hurt. Similarly, Coupang (South Korea's leading e‑commerce platform) plunged after a cyberattack, but the setback is temporary. The takeaway: don't let market noise distract you from real value.
The Oakmark Fund (Investor Class) underperformed its benchmark, the MSCI World ex USA Index, in the first quarter of 2026, but has still delivered strong performance since its inception. The report's core argument is that current stock markets are driven by short-term noise and herd behavior rather
This chapter primarily discusses the performance of the Oakmark Fund in the first quarter of 2026, portfolio changes, and the assessment of the market environment. The report notes that the current stock market is driven by short-term noise, geopolitical headlines, and extreme stock divergence, rather than corporate intrinsic value. Therefore, the fund adheres to a patient and disciplined investment strategy.
The author's core investment thesis is: The current market is dominated by short-term herd behavior, not fundamentals. Hence, the fund focuses on companies whose stock prices are significantly below intrinsic value, waiting for long-term value to revert. Counterintuitive judgments include the belief that the AI risk for Dassault Systèmes is misjudged by the market, as its physical simulation software possesses a unique moat; and that enterprise software companies like SAP and LSEG, after being pressured by the AI narrative, are trading at historically low valuations, yet their actual business moats remain solid.
| Company | Role | Key Data | Bullish/Bearish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glencore | Top Contributor | Strong Q4 copper production, dividends above expectations | Bullish |
| Dassault Systèmes | Top Detractor | Weak Q4 results, cautious 2026 guidance, valuation near decade low | Bullish (AI risk misjudged) |
| Compass Group | New Purchase | Global leader in contract food services, stock pressured by AI employment concerns | Bullish |
| Coupang | New Purchase | South Korean e-commerce leader, vertically integrated logistics, stock fell due to cyberattack | Bullish |
| Haleon | New Purchase | Global consumer healthcare leader, management improvement post-spin-off, stock pressured by technical factors | Bullish |
| SAP | New Purchase | Global ERP leader, accelerating cloud migration, valuation depressed by AI narrative | Bullish |
| LSEG | New Purchase | Multi-asset trading infrastructure, monopoly assets, valuation at decade low | Bullish |
| Unicharm | New Purchase | Personal care, intensified competition in China/Southeast Asia, but profit share fell to ~20% | Bullish |