← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly30 Sep 2020Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark International Fund: Third Quarter 2020

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report covers the Oakmark International Fund's performance for the third quarter of 2020. The fund has a solid long-term track record (8.26% annual return since 1992), but it lost 11.37% in the past year, showing short-term weakness. It also cut fees slightly (from 1.03% to 0.98%) through a temporary waiver that ends in January 2021. For regular investors, this means: past performance doesn't guarantee future results, short-term losses can be big, and fee cuts may not last. Worth a read to understand the risks of international funds.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) performance data as of September 30, 2020 shows an annualized return of 8.26% since inception in September 1992, but a loss of 11.37% over the past year, a return of only 2.25% over the past five years, a return of 4.10% over the past ten years, and a rebo

~2 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section focuses on the performance and fee structure of the Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) as of September 30, 2020. The report is set against a backdrop of heightened market volatility, during which the fund's short-term performance faced pressure, though its long-term returns remain a reference point.

Core Viewpoint

The author's key judgment is that the fund has delivered solid long-term performance (annualized return of 8.26% since inception in 1992), but suffered an 11.37% loss over the past year due to market headwinds, with short-term performance significantly lagging the long-term trend. On fees, an advisory fee waiver agreement (effective until January 27, 2021) reduced the net expense ratio from 1.03% to 0.98%, reflecting an intent to control costs.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Long-Term Performance: Since inception in September 1992, the annualized return stands at 8.26%, demonstrating long-term compounding ability.
  • Short-Term Pressure: The fund posted an 11.37% loss over the past year, a 2.25% return over the past five years, and a 4.10% return over the past ten years, all below the long-term average.
  • Recent Rebound: A 3.64% return over the past three months suggests some improvement in market sentiment or fundamentals.
  • Fee Optimization: The gross expense ratio is 1.03%, while the net expense ratio is 0.98%, with the 0.05% difference stemming from the advisory fee waiver agreement.

Performance Comparison Table:

Time Period Return
Since Inception (1992/09) 8.26%
10 Years 4.10%
5 Years 2.25%
1 Year -11.37%
3 Months 3.64%

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark International Fund: The fund itself; the report does not mention specific holdings. It is the subject of analysis, with the author holding a neutral-to-positive view on its long-term performance but a negative view on its short-term performance.

Investment Insights

  • Short-Term Risk Exposure: A loss of over 11% in the past year indicates the fund's limited defensive capability in bear markets or high-volatility environments, requiring investors to assess their own risk tolerance.
  • Long-Term Value Questioned: A five-year return of only 2.25%, significantly below the average since inception, may reflect structural challenges (e.g., ineffective stock selection strategies or shifts in market style).
  • Limited Fee Advantage: While the net expense ratio of 0.98% is below the industry average, the waiver agreement is only effective until January 2021, after which fees may rise, warranting attention to subsequent adjustments.