← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly31 Dec 2016Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark International Fund: Fourth Quarter 2016

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report shows how the Oakmark International Fund performed from 1992 to the end of 2016. The big takeaway: if you held it for 24 years, you earned about 9.66% per year. But over the last 10 years, it only made 4.15% annually because of the 2008 financial crisis. However, over the last 5 years it bounced back to 10.41%. For regular investors, this means don't panic-sell during downturns—staying invested long-term tends to pay off. Also, the fund charges a 1% annual fee, which adds up over time.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

The performance report of the Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) as of December 31, 2016, shows an annualized return of 9.66% since its inception on September 30, 1992, with 10-year, 5-year, 1-year, and 3-month returns of 4.15%, 10.41%, 7.91%, and 6.42%, respectively. The fund's gross expen

~3 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section presents the performance data of the Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) as of December 31, 2016, covering long-term returns since its inception in September 1992 and returns over various recent periods. The report uses historical data to demonstrate the fund's long-term investment results, providing a performance benchmark for investors.

Core Thesis

The author's core investment argument is that the fund has achieved solid long-term annualized returns (9.66%) since inception, but recent performance (1-year, 3-month) has fallen below the long-term average, reflecting the suppression of short-term returns by global market volatility. Counterintuitively, although the 10-year annualized return is only 4.15% (below the long-term average), the 5-year return (10.41%) has rebounded significantly, indicating the fund's strong recovery capability over medium-term cycles.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Long-Term Performance: From inception on September 30, 1992, to December 31, 2016, the annualized return was 9.66%, demonstrating sustained growth over 24 years.
  • Medium-Term vs. Short-Term Comparison: The 10-year return (4.15%) is notably lower than the 5-year (10.41%) and 1-year (7.91%) returns, suggesting that the recovery phase following the 2008 financial crisis (2011–2016) contributed the bulk of gains.
  • Recent Volatility: The 3-month return (6.42%) exceeds the 1-year return, hinting at a phased rebound in the market during the fourth quarter of 2016.
Time Period Annualized Return
Since Inception (1992/09/30) 9.66%
10-Year 4.15%
5-Year 10.41%
1-Year 7.91%
3-Month 6.42%

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class): The fund analyzed in the report, with no specific holdings disclosed. The fund's expense ratio is 1.00% (as of September 30, 2016), and it is an actively managed international equity fund.

Investment Insights

  • Long-Term Holding Outperforms Market Timing: The fund's 24-year annualized return of 9.66% far exceeds the 10-year (4.15%) and 1-year (7.91%) returns, indicating that short-term volatility does not alter long-term trends. Investors should avoid exiting due to short-term drawdowns.
  • Focus on Medium-Term Cycle Opportunities: The 5-year return (10.41%) is significantly higher than the 10-year return, suggesting that actively managed international funds can capture structural rebounds during medium-term cycles after financial crises. The current period (end of 2016) may be at a similar cycle starting point.
  • Fee Sensitivity: The 1.00% expense ratio is moderate among active funds, but over the long term, compounding will erode returns. Continuous assessment of the alignment between management fees and excess returns is necessary.