← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly30 Sep 2012Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark International Fund: Third Quarter 2012

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report shows how the Oakmark International Fund performed from 1992 to 2012. Long-term returns are solid (about 10% annualized), but it lost money over the past 5 years (-0.11%) before rebounding 17% in the last year. For regular investors: if you can hold for 10+ years, value investing like this might work; but short-term ups and downs are big, so don't chase the recent rally. The 1.06% fee is moderate but eats into gains. Worth a read to see if this fund fits your long-term plan.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

The average annualized total returns of the Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) as of September 30, 2012, are as follows: 9.80% since inception on September 30, 1992; 10.75% over the 10-year period; -0.11% over the 5-year period; 17.40% over the 1-year period; and 8.18% over the 3-month peri

~3 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section presents the performance data of the Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) as of September 30, 2012, covering long-term, medium-term, and short-term returns, along with the expense ratio. The context is that investors need to evaluate the fund's historical performance and cost structure in volatile markets.

Core Thesis

The report's implicit core thesis is that the fund has delivered steady long-term returns (since its inception in 1992 and over the 10-year period), but its 5-year return is negative, indicating challenges over the medium cycle. The strong short-term rebound (1-year and 3-month) may reflect improved market conditions or the effectiveness of the investment strategy. The expense ratio of 1.06% is at a moderate level, and its erosion of net returns warrants attention.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Long-term Performance: Since inception on September 30, 1992, the annualized return is 9.80%, and the 10-year annualized return is 10.75%, both higher than common benchmarks (e.g., the MSCI EAFE Index at approximately 6-8% over the same period), demonstrating the effectiveness of the long-term value investment strategy.
  • Medium-term Performance: The 5-year annualized return is -0.11%, near zero, reflecting the impact of the 2008 financial crisis and the subsequent European debt crisis on international markets.
  • Short-term Rebound: The 1-year return is 17.40%, and the 3-month return is 8.18%, indicating recent improvements in market sentiment or that the fund's holdings have benefited from a cyclical recovery.
  • Expenses: The gross expense ratio is 1.06%, higher than index funds (typically <0.5%) but lower than the average for actively managed funds (approximately 1.2-1.5%).
Time Period Annualized Return Notes
Since Inception (1992/09/30) 9.80% Long-term steady
10-Year 10.75% Significantly outperforms most international indices
5-Year -0.11% Dragged down by the financial crisis
1-Year 17.40% Strong short-term rebound
3-Month 8.18% Recent strong momentum

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class): The subject of analysis, with no specific holdings disclosed. The fund's strategy is value investing, focusing on international equities. The data suggests that its holdings may have performed well in the recent rebound, but specific targets are not disclosed.

Investment Implications

  • Long-term Holders: The fund's historical long-term return (9.80% annualized) indicates that if investors can tolerate medium-term volatility (e.g., negative 5-year returns), the value investment strategy is effective over cycles of 10 years or more. It is recommended to consider the impact of expenses on compounding, as a 1.06% expense ratio can erode approximately 15-20% of final returns over 20 years.
  • Short-term Traders: The recent strong rebound (17.40% over 1 year) may not be sustainable, and caution is advised against chasing highs. The negative 5-year return shows the fund is sensitive to market cycles, making it suitable for entry at low valuations.
  • Benchmark Comparison: Investors should compare these returns with the MSCI EAFE Index or similar international funds to determine the source of excess returns. If the fund consistently outperforms over the long term, it may be worth allocating to; if the outperformance is only a short-term rebound, caution is warranted.