← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly30 Sep 2011Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark International Fund: Third Quarter 2011

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report covers the Oakmark International Fund's performance through September 2011. The fund has done well over the long term (averaging 9.41% annual return since 1992), but it lost 20.42% in the last three months—a huge short-term drop. For regular investors, this means international stock funds can be very volatile; even holding for five years could lose money (average -0.60% per year). It's worth reading because it shows you need to check your risk tolerance, not just focus on past long-term gains.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

The Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) report as of September 30, 2011, shows that since its inception in September 1992, the fund has achieved an average annual total return of 9.41%, with a 10-year return of 8.81%. However, its returns over the past 5 years, 1 year, and 3 months have been

~3 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section centers on the performance data of the Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class) as of September 30, 2011, showcasing the fund's returns across different time horizons. The report aims to reveal the significant divergence between the fund's long-term and short-term performance, providing investors with a quantitative reference for risk and return.

Core Viewpoint

The author's core judgment is that the Oakmark International Fund has delivered steady long-term performance (with an average annual return of 9.41% since its inception in 1992), but its short-term performance has sharply deteriorated (with a loss of 20.42% over the past three months), highlighting the impact of market volatility on international investments. Counterintuitively, although the 10-year return remains at 8.81%, the 5-year return has turned negative (-0.60%), indicating that long-term holding does not fully mitigate short-term risks.

Key Arguments and Data

The report quantifies the fund's dramatic performance fluctuations through a comparison across time horizons. All data is sourced directly from the original text, with no additions.

Time Horizon Average Annual Total Return
Since Inception (September 1992) 9.41%
10 Years 8.81%
5 Years -0.60%
1 Year -10.54%
3 Months -20.42%
  • Long-term vs. Short-term Divergence: Returns since inception and over 10 years are positive (9.41% and 8.81%, respectively), but returns over the past 5 years, 1 year, and 3 months are all negative, with losses escalating progressively (from -0.60% to -20.42%).
  • Expense Ratio: The Gross Expense Ratio is 1.08% (as of September 30, 2010), representing a fixed cost that impacts net returns.

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark International Fund (Investor Class): This is the core asset under analysis, an international equity fund. The report does not mention specific holdings, focusing solely on the fund's overall performance. The author's stance toward the fund is neutral with a cautious tilt: long-term performance is commendable, but short-term risks warrant attention.

Investment Insights

  • Prioritize Short-Term Risk: A loss of 20.42% over the past three months indicates that international equity funds may face severe drawdowns in extreme market conditions. Investors must assess their own risk tolerance to avoid being forced to cut losses due to short-term volatility.
  • Long-Term Holding Is Not a Panacea: Although the 10-year return is positive, the 5-year return has turned negative, suggesting that long-term holding does not automatically smooth out all cycles. Active management or diversified allocation may be necessary.
  • Fee Sensitivity: An expense ratio of 1.08% is moderate among actively managed funds, but if short-term returns are negative, fees further erode principal. Investors should prioritize lower-cost or more stable-performing alternatives.