← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly30 Sep 2019Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark Fund: Third Quarter 2019

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report covers Oakmark Fund's performance through September 2019. Since its 1991 launch, it has averaged 12.17% annual returns—strong long-term. But recent one-year and three-month returns were negative, showing market ups and downs. For everyday investors, the key takeaway: if you can hold for years, this low-cost fund (0.85% yearly fee) may work well; just don't panic over short-term losses. Worth reading because it clearly separates long-term success from short-term noise.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

Oakmark Fund reported average annualized total returns as of September 30, 2019: 12.17% since inception on August 5, 1991, 12.08% over 10 years, 7.27% over 5 years, -5.68% over 1 year, and -2.06% over 3 months. In terms of fees, the gross expense ratio is 0.89%, and the net expense ratio is 0.85%. T

~2 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section focuses on the performance and fee structure of the Oakmark Fund (Investor Class) as of September 30, 2019. The report presents the fund's long-term return data since its inception in 1991, as well as its negative short-term returns in the recent period, aiming to provide investors with a benchmark reference for the fund's historical performance and cost efficiency.

Core Viewpoint

The author's core judgment is that the Oakmark Fund has demonstrated strong long-term performance, with an annualized return of 12.17% since inception. However, its recent returns (1-year and 3-month) are negative, indicating that market volatility has pressured short-term performance. The fund's expense ratio is low (net expense ratio of 0.85%), offering a cost advantage among its peers.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Outstanding Long-Term Returns: Since its inception on August 5, 1991, the annualized total return is 12.17%, and the 10-year annualized return is 12.08%, both significantly above the market average.
  • Pressure on Short-Term Performance: The 1-year return is -5.68%, and the 3-month return is -2.06%, reflecting the negative impact of recent market downturns or portfolio adjustments.
  • Transparent Fee Structure: The gross expense ratio is 0.89%, and the net expense ratio is 0.85%. The low fee level is conducive to long-term compound growth.
Time Period Average Annual Total Return
Since Inception (1991/08/05) 12.17%
10-Year 12.08%
5-Year 7.27%
1-Year -5.68%
3-Month -2.06%
Fee Type Ratio
Gross Expense Ratio (as of 2018/09/30) 0.89%
Net Expense Ratio (as of 2018/09/30) 0.85%

Companies/Assets Involved

  • Oakmark Fund: The core subject of analysis, an actively managed mutual fund. The report does not mention specific portfolio holdings but implies through performance data that its investment strategy is effective over the long term, though it is affected by market volatility in the short term.

Investment Insights

  • Long-Term Investors May Take Note: The fund's 12.17% annualized return since inception indicates that its strategy has the ability to generate excess returns across multiple market cycles, making it suitable for investors with a holding period exceeding five years.
  • Short-Term Risks Require Caution: The negative 1-year and 3-month returns suggest that the current market environment may be unfavorable for value-oriented or concentrated portfolio strategies. Investors should assess their own risk tolerance and avoid redemptions driven by short-term volatility.
  • Cost Advantage Is a Plus: The net expense ratio of 0.85% is below the industry average (typically above 1%), which can reduce the erosion of long-term returns and enhance the compounding effect.