← Back to list
Oakmark FundsQuarterly31 Mar 2017Source: oakmark.com

Oakmark Fund: First Quarter 2017

Oakmark is the mutual fund family launched in 1991 by Harris Associates, the Chicago deep-value firm founded in 1976 (about $105bn AUM). Bill Nygren runs the flagship Oakmark Fund and David Herro the Oakmark International Fund, buying businesses at large discounts to intrinsic value and holding them like owners — publishing quarterly fund commentaries, market commentaries and insight articles.

Bill Nygren、David Herro · 1991 · 美国芝加哥Deep value / contrarian long-term

In plain words

This report shows how Oakmark Fund performed over 26 years (1991–2017) to prove that buying undervalued stocks and holding them long-term works. For regular investors, the key takeaway is not to chase short-term gains (like 24% in one year) but focus on long-term averages (12.78% annualized). The fund also has low fees (0.89%), which saves money over time. It’s worth reading because real data shows patience and low costs beat frequent trading.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

Oakmark Fund (Investor Class) investment return data as of March 31, 2017 shows an annualized return of 12.78% since its inception on August 5, 1991, with returns of 8.97%, 13.88%, 23.99%, and 4.11% over the past 10 years, 5 years, 1 year, and 3 months, respectively. The report's core argument empha

~2 min full read · 5 sections
Deep Analysis

Theme and Background

This section presents the long-term investment performance data of the Oakmark Fund (Investor Class) as of March 31, 2017, aiming to validate the effectiveness of its value investing strategy across 26 years of market cycles. By comparing returns over different time horizons, the report emphasizes the core logic of long-term holding and selecting undervalued assets.

Core Thesis

The author’s central investment argument is that a long-term value investing strategy can navigate market volatility and deliver consistent excess returns. The counterintuitive insight is that, despite the 1-year return (23.99%) being significantly higher than the long-term average, the author believes this is not due to short-term market timing but rather the inevitable outcome of holding undervalued assets over the long term.

Key Arguments and Data

  • Long-term Performance Validation: Since its inception on August 5, 1991, the fund has achieved an annualized return of 12.78%, significantly outperforming the S&P 500 Index (approximately 9.5%) over the same period.
  • Short-term vs. Long-term Comparison: The 10-year annualized return of 8.97% is lower than the 5-year (13.88%) and 1-year (23.99%) figures, indicating that the strategy can control drawdowns during bear markets (e.g., 2008) but exhibits stronger resilience in bull markets.
  • Cost Advantage: The total expense ratio of 0.89% is below the average for comparable actively managed funds (approximately 1.2%), reducing the drag on compounding.
Time Horizon Annualized Return Market Context
Since Inception (26 years) 12.78% Covers multiple bull and bear cycles
Last 10 Years 8.97% Includes the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent recovery
Last 5 Years 13.88% Prolonged U.S. stock bull market
Last 1 Year 23.99% Market rally following Trump’s election
Last 3 Months 4.11% Market volatility in Q1 2017

Companies/Assets Involved

This section does not mention specific holdings; the analysis focuses solely on the fund’s overall performance. The core asset class is U.S. equities, with a strategy centered on high-quality companies undervalued by the market.

Investment Insights

  • Long-term Holding Outperforms Market Timing: The 26-year annualized return of 12.78% demonstrates that ignoring short-term fluctuations and adhering to value stock selection can generate steady compounding.
  • Cost is a Key Variable: The 0.89% expense ratio is competitive among active funds; investors should prioritize low-cost products.
  • Beware of Short-term Performance Traps: The 1-year high return of 23.99% is unsustainable; attention should be paid to the strategy’s defensive capabilities during bear markets (e.g., the 10-year return of 8.97% already incorporates the 2008 crash).