← Back to list
Colossus (Invest Like the Best / Business Breakdowns)Podcast29 Jan 2019Source: traffic.libsyn.comHost: Patrick O'Shaughnessy

Alex Mittal – Early Stage Investing - [Invest Like the Best, EP.119]

In plain words

This episode features Alex Mittal, an early-stage investor who explains how to spot investments that look bad but are actually great. He says the best opportunities are both 'crazy' and 'boring,' and market consensus is the biggest obstacle. He's bullish on Ethereum but warns that price drops with usage growth are the real signal. Key holdings: Coinbase (invested when Bitcoin was $6, now the top crypto exchange), GitLab (open-source and remote, valued over $1B), Instacart (grocery delivery, succeeded after Webvan failed).

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

Alex Mittal, co-founder of Funders Club, shared insights from nearly 300 early-stage investments over the past seven years on the Invest Like the Best podcast. Funders Club is a unique venture capital firm built around a network of investors and entrepreneurs, where members submit deals and co-inves

~12 min full read · 9 sections
Deep Analysis

Alex Mittal – Early-Stage Investing [Invest Like the Best, EP.119]

At a Glance

Alex Mittal, co-founder of Funders Club, has invested in nearly 300 early-stage companies over the past seven years. The central theme of this episode: how to systematically identify investment opportunities that "look bad but are actually excellent." Mittal's core thesis: the best early-stage investment opportunities often simultaneously exhibit the traits of "seeming crazy" and "seeming boring," and market consensus is precisely the biggest obstacle to recognizing these opportunities.


1. Funders Club’s Unique Model: Network Scale + Centralized Decision-Making

Viewpoint: Early-stage investing cannot rely on consensus decision-making; centralized judgment must be preserved

Alex Mittal argues that, although Funders Club has a network of over 20,000 accredited investors, investment decisions must be made by a centralized team. "We spent a lot of time studying whether we could use crowdsourcing to pick outliers, and the conclusion is—you can’t rely on consensus."

Argument: The value of the network lies in data and trust, not voting

  • Scale dimension: 20,000+ investors, 300 portfolio companies, covering 20+ countries
  • Trust dimension: Companies are willing to share core KPIs (e.g., net revenue retention, customer acquisition cost) because Funders Club is both an investor and provides data benchmarks
  • Data application: For replicable business models such as SaaS and consumer markets, valuation models have been established—"Input parameters and it outputs the valuation on the term sheet they’re about to receive, with astonishing accuracy"

Inference: The core advantage of this model lies in possessing both "scale" and "trust"

Most VCs either have scale without trust (e.g., pure platforms) or trust without scale (e.g., traditional partnerships). Funders Club seeks to achieve both.


2. The Venn Diagram of "Seems Terrible but Is Actually Great": The Sweet Spot of Early-Stage Investing

At a Glance: The best investment opportunities lie at the intersection of "seems like a bad idea" and "is actually a good idea"

Alex Mittal emphasizes that this intersection is far smaller than people imagine, and even after a company grows, it remains non-obvious. "When Facebook was valued at $2 billion, most media outlets were still urging it to accept Yahoo's $2 billion acquisition offer."

Argument: The Pervasiveness of "Misjudgment" from Historical Cases

Case What Seemed Terrible at the Time Actual Outcome
Coinbase (invested in 2012) Bitcoin at $6, only association was the Silk Road black market Became the largest cryptocurrency exchange platform
GitLab Open-source model (code given free to competitors) + fully remote work Valuation exceeded $1 billion
Instacart Webvan had just failed, burning $1 billion; trying grocery delivery again was "insane" Became a unicorn

Key Insight: Even Founders Themselves Can Be Severely Wrong

  • Google: Larry and Sergey once tried to sell the technology for $750,000–$1.6 million, and the buyer even planned to "throw the algorithm into a closet"
  • Vitalik Buterin (Ethereum founder): In 2016, sold 25% of his holdings at $10/ETH; 18 months later, the price had multiplied 30 times

> "If innovators themselves cannot quantify future value, how can investors possibly do so?" — Alex Mittal


III. The Bull Case for Ethereum: Price-Utility Decoupling Is the Signal

View: Mittal Remains Highly Enthusiastic About Ethereum, but Funders Club Voluntarily Paused Blockchain Investments During the 2017-2018 Speculative Peak

Alex Mittal believes that Ethereum's core value lies in "trustless transactions and computation"—a foundational technology that did not previously exist.

Argument: A Plunge in Price Alongside Growth in Usage Is the Real Signal

  • MakerDAO: The decentralized stablecoin DAI, a "fully self-operating financial institution," unprecedented in history
  • Golem (decentralized computing network): Despite a 90% decline in cryptocurrency prices, usage grew 5x over the past year
  • DocuSign: Announced integration with the Ethereum blockchain for ledger recording of electronic signatures

Falsification Condition: If These Early Use Cases Fail to Scale, the Bull Case Collapses

Mittal acknowledges that "this is still a super early stage," but he cites the Financial Times headline "Ethereum Utility in Doubt as Price Plunges" as a counterexample—"Mainstream media cannot decouple price from utility, and that is precisely the signal investors should watch."

Important Disclosure: Funders Club Has Never Purchased Tokens, Only Invested in Equity

  • Peak blockchain investment occurred in 2016
  • 2017-2018: Zero new blockchain investments, with only one follow-on investment (Chainalysis, alongside Benchmark)
  • "When speculation reaches a certain level of frenzy, even if you are bullish on the technology, as an investor you have to pause."

4. Opportunities in the "Boring": Retail, Logistics, Chips, and Hard Science

At a Glance: Seemingly "boring" industries often hide massive structural opportunities

Alex Mittal points out that after the e-commerce bubble burst, VCs generally avoided the retail/logistics sector, but Amazon's rise created rigid demand for infrastructure.

Argument: Investment opportunities can be found at every link in the supply chain

Link Investment Case Core Logic
Cross-border logistics Flexport Using software to transform freight forwarding, making "logistics sexy"
E-commerce fulfillment Chippo Helping e-commerce manage returns and reverse logistics, with double-digit week-over-week growth
Autonomous trucks Embark Trucks Highway scenarios are far simpler than urban autonomous driving, and truck driving is the largest occupation in the U.S. with extremely high accident rates
Industrial inspection Gecko Robotics Using robots to replace manual climbing of power plant boilers, where people die every year

Chip Design: Looking at Future Trends Through Bitcoin's "Computing Race"

Mittal views Bitcoin's PoW race as a "petri dish for computing demand":

  • Historical path: CPU → GPU → FPGA → ASIC (application-specific chips)
  • Current analogy: Machine learning/AI's demand for computing is highly similar to Bitcoin
  • Trend judgment: Computing is shifting from "general-purpose" back to "specialized" — hardware designed for specific algorithms

Hard Science Investment: Only 10% of the portfolio, but represents true "madness"

  • OTI Lumionics: Using quantum computing + machine learning to accelerate materials discovery, already collaborating with Fortune 500 companies
  • Neurable: Brain-computer interface; users need only 1 minute of training to control games with their thoughts ("20x faster response than traditional solutions")
  • Life sciences: Using software tools to test thousands of drug combinations, discovering therapies previously deemed impossible

5. Founder Assessment: Market > Team, but "Tenacity" Matters Most

At a Glance: Market forces far outweigh the team, yet founder traits remain a key variable

Alex Mittal emphasizes that he first tells entrepreneurs: "The market can make an imperfect team succeed, or it can destroy a perfect team. Choosing the right market is more important than anything else."

Argument: Three Validated Founder Traits

Trait Representative Figure Specific Manifestation
Tenacity Chris Bennett (Wonderschool) Transitioned from Instagram e-commerce to "Airbnb-style preschools," enduring years of effort
Learning Ability Brian Armstrong (Coinbase) Absorbs information like a sponge; questions are not small talk but "data ingestion"
Curiosity Same as above Described by Yale's David Swensen as "the most underrated investment trait"

Counterintuitive Observation: Mittal believes the VC industry overemphasizes the "perfect founder" archetype

"You can have a perfect team, but if the market doesn't exist, you will still fail. Conversely, a red-hot market can mask a multitude of team flaws."


Referenced Positions

Position Guest Stance Key Data
Coinbase Bullish (early investor) Invested in 2012, BTC at $6 at the time
GitLab Bullish (the only investment decision reversed) Changed from "not investing" to "investing," increased holdings in subsequent rounds
Instacart Bullish Persisted despite Webvan's failure, ultimately succeeded
Flexport Bullish Using software to transform freight forwarding
Embark Trucks Bullish (one of the first investors) Focused on highway autonomous driving
Chippo Bullish Double-digit week-over-week growth
Gecko Robotics Bullish Replacing manual inspection of power plant boilers
OTI Lumionics Bullish Quantum computing + materials science
Neurable Bullish Brain-computer interface, 1-minute training
Chainalysis Bullish (follow-on investor) Co-invested with Benchmark
MakerDAO Neutral observation Decentralized stablecoin DAI
Golem Neutral observation 5x usage growth (price down 90%)
Wonderschool Bullish Turned from failure to success
Slack Case reference Pivoted from a gaming company

Judgments Worth Remembering

1. "The best investment opportunities lie at the intersection of 'seems like a bad idea' and 'is actually a good idea,' and this intersection is far smaller than people imagine." (Alex Mittal) — Even after a company grows, it remains non-obvious; when Facebook had a $2 billion market cap, the media was still urging it to accept an acquisition offer.

2. "Even founders themselves cannot quantify future value — Google once tried to sell for $750,000, and Vitalik sold 25% of his holdings at $10/ETH." (Alex Mittal) — If even innovators cannot do it, investors should remain even more humble.

3. "A price crash accompanied by rising usage is the real signal — Golem saw 5x usage growth while its price fell 90%." (Alex Mittal) — Mainstream media cannot decouple price from utility, and that is precisely the investor's opportunity.

4. "Funders Club made zero new investments during the 2017–2018 blockchain speculation peak — even if you are bullish on the technology, you must pause when prices go crazy." (Alex Mittal) — Investing requires understanding the duality of being "bullish" and "not investing."

5. "The market can make an imperfect team succeed, and it can also destroy a perfect team. Choosing the right market matters more than anything else." (Alex Mittal) — This is a rebuttal to the "founder-first" thesis and the top piece of advice for entrepreneurs.

6. "Computing is shifting back from general-purpose to specialized — Bitcoin's PoW arms race is a petri dish for future computing demand." (Alex Mittal) — The path from CPU → GPU → ASIC is being replayed in the machine learning space.

7. "The best founder traits are not 'perfection,' but 'relentlessness' + 'sponge-like learning ability' + 'genuine curiosity.'" (Alex Mittal) — Brian Armstrong possesses all three, and David Swenson considers curiosity the most underrated investment trait.

8. "The VC industry is overly fixated on the 'perfect founder' profile, but GitLab's case proves — even if you make two seemingly terrible decisions at once, 'open source' and 'remote work,' you can still build a $1 billion company." (Alex Mittal) — This is the only case where Funders Club reversed an investment decision.