← Back to list
Colossus (Invest Like the Best / Business Breakdowns)Podcast14 Nov 2023Source: joincolossus.comHost: Patrick O'Shaughnessy

Brad Jacobs - Think Big and Move Fast - [Invest Like the Best, EP.352]

In plain words

Brad Jacobs, a serial entrepreneur, explains his strategy: buy big, messy companies that others avoid, fix them, and profit. He says markets undervalue these 'big hairy deals.' He highlights XPO: after a short-seller attack tanked the stock, he bought back $2 billion of shares—the stock tripled in two years. He also split XPO into three focused firms (RXO, GXO), boosting their valuation from 8x to 11-13x earnings. Key lesson: don't buy 'priced for perfection' stocks; buy when fear creates bargains.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

At a Glance

Brad Jacobs is a serial entrepreneur who has founded seven billion-dollar companies and completed over 500 M&A deals. He currently serves as Executive Chairman of logistics giant XPO. The core thread of this interview is his practical philosophy of "Think Big, Move Fast" in investing and operations.

The most weighty judgment in the entire episode: Brad Jacobs believes that large-scale M&A deals ("large, hairy deals") are the core source of excess returns, because such deals are often undervalued by the market due to existing "problems," but once these "problems" are resolved, enormous value can be unlocked.

Key Themes

I. M&A Investment Philosophy: Focus on "Large, Hairy Deals"

Brad Jacobs believes that in M&A, true excess returns come from deals that are large in scale but also have obvious problems ("hairy").

  • Argument: Jacobs proposes a four-quadrant M&A framework:
  • Large & Easy (No Hair): Such deals do not exist.
  • Small & Hairy: Small scale, many problems, not worth doing.
  • Small & No Hair: Simple, but too small in scale to create significant value.
  • Large & Hairy: This is the profit center. The key lies in deep analysis and subsequent integration to "shave off the hair" and release value.
  • Data Support: The approximately 500 M&A deals he led had an average purchase multiple in the mid-to-high single digits (mid-to-high single digits EBITDA), rather than high-multiple tech companies.
  • Inference: Successful M&A does not lie in finding flawless targets, but in identifying, evaluating, and resolving the risks in "large, hairy deals." Investors should focus on large targets that are mispriced by the market due to short-term issues.
II. Capital Allocation: Emphasizing Both Price and Valuation Multiple, Stressing the Buy Spread

Brad Jacobs's investment strategy core is "buying the spread" (disagio), i.e., using the company's own higher valuation multiple to acquire assets valued at a lower multiple, while strictly adhering to price discipline.

  • Argument:
  • Buying Timing: Through XPO's $2 billion buyback case in 2018, he demonstrates how to exploit market irrationality (a short-seller report caused the stock to drop 26% in a short period, making the P/E ratio "ridiculously cheap"), conduct large-scale buybacks at low stock prices, and see the stock triple in two years, earning $6 billion.
  • Valuation Multiple: He realized the market's discount on conglomerates, so he split XPO into three pure-play companies (XPO, RXO, GXO), each receiving an EBITDA valuation of 11-13x, far above the previous over 8x as a conglomerate, thereby achieving "valuation multiple expansion."
  • Price Discipline: He emphasizes that if the purchase price is too high, even with good operations, it may take years to recover the loss. Therefore, he explicitly states, "I don't like buying companies that are priced for perfection."
  • Inference: Investors should pay attention to the spread between the company's own valuation level (cost of capital) and the valuation of its acquisition targets. When the spread is large enough, this is a powerful value creation engine. Meanwhile, shifts in market style (e.g., from disliking conglomerates to preferring pure-plays) can serve as important valuation catalysts.
III. Team and Culture Building: Creating "Electric Meetings" and Talent Identification

Brad Jacobs believes that excellent execution stems from a unique organizational culture, whose core lies in "electric meetings" and precise talent identification, rather than relying solely on incentives.

  • Argument:
  • "Electric Meeting" Mechanism: The meeting agenda is generated by participants voting via an app, discussing the most concerning issues. Electronic devices are banned during the meeting, requiring everyone to fully concentrate on the speaker. The goal is to create a safe, respectful, and open debating environment, encouraging "collision of ideas" rather than "personal attacks."
  • Talent Identification: He spends a significant amount of time interviewing the core team of the acquired company, asking questions like "If you were in my shoes, what would you do?" He values "inborn qualities" (DNA), such as being honest to the bone, hardworking, humble, and collaborative, rather than trainable skills.
  • Cultural Integration: In M&A integration, he advocates "listening and demonstrating sincere respectfulness," proactively soliciting improvement suggestions from the acquired company's employees, thereby releasing suppressed "information flow."
  • Inference: The cultural efficiency of an organization (e.g., meeting efficiency, information transparency) is key to determining its ultimate execution speed. For investors, evaluating the management team's ability to build culture may be more important than analyzing its strategic plans, because a good culture is the guarantee of strategy implementation.
IV. Technology Application: Judging Trends, Contrarian Thinking, but Beware of "False Trends"

Brad Jacobs emphasizes that the key to technology application is to "judge the big trends" and ensure you are on the side supporting the trend, while also being wary of seemingly grand but actually unimplementable "false trends."

  • Argument:
  • Judging Trends: Through the XPO case, he illustrates betting early on the "automation of brokerage" trend, hiring Mario Harik (with an MIT machine learning background) in 2011, ultimately raising XPO's electronic transaction ratio from 0% to 97%.
  • Method of Getting Ideas: He does not push technology top-down; instead, he uses a "reverse questioning" approach, asking employees and customers to describe "ideal technology tools with no financial constraints," then sorts them by ROIC to form a feasible technology investment plan.
  • Beware of False Trends: Using his own experience, he mistakenly entered the equipment rental industry in 1999 due to the U.S. TEA-21 plan to invest $600 billion in infrastructure repair, ultimately resulting in a $500 million loss. He concludes that huge government spending commitments do not necessarily translate into actual industry demand.
  • Judgment on the Future: He believes the accounting industry faces a huge "existential risk" due to the disruptive potential of AI, because processes like individual tax filing are "very mechanical and formulaic, AI will easily replace them."
  • Inference: The risk of technology investment lies not in the technology itself, but in misjudging the trend. Investors should identify trends that truly change the underlying business logic of an industry (e.g., automation, sharing economy), rather than chasing government policies or short-term fads. Meanwhile, the efficiency of a company's technology application can be measured by the effectiveness of its "upward feedback" mechanism.

Mentioned Positions

Position Guest Attitude Key Data
XPO Hold (increased via large-scale buyback) Bought back $2 billion in 2018, stock tripled in two years; after splitting into three companies, each subsidiary's valuation multiple rose from 8x to 11-13x
RXO Bullish (as a pure-play after spin-off) Technology-driven, electronic transaction ratio from 0% to 97%; valued higher as a pure-play company after spin-off
GXO Bullish (as a pure-play after spin-off) Owns 200 warehouses, totaling over 200 million square feet; collaborates with Nestlé on "future warehouse"
United Rentals Bullish (historical case) Stock rose from $3.50 to $435; integrated over 200 companies through M&A
United Waste Systems Bullish (historical case) Outperformed the S&P 500 by 5.6x from 1992 to sale; ultimately sold for $2.5 billion
Conway / Menlo Logistics Bullish (as historical M&A case) Acquired for $3 billion, now worth several times that

Key Takeaways

1. "Large, hairy deals" are the source of excess returns. Brad Jacobs proposes a four-quadrant M&A chart, arguing that only "large, hairy deals" can create real value because their complexity is underestimated by the market, and the potential is huge once resolved. Support: This is the framework summarized from his 500 deals.

2. "Buying the spread" is the core lever of value creation. Brad Jacobs points out that using the company's own high valuation multiple to acquire low-valuation assets is one of the most important levers to generate alpha. Support: In the XPO buyback case, $2 billion input, $6 billion output.

3. The operating rules of "electric meetings." Brad Jacobs proposes the concept of "electric meetings," emphasizing that the agenda is generated by employee votes, electronic devices are banned during the meeting, aiming to create a safe, respectful, and open debating environment to enhance decision-making efficiency and team execution. Support: This is the core mechanism that distinguishes his company from "boring meetings."

4. AI poses an "existential risk" to the accounting industry. Brad Jacobs judges that processes like individual tax filing in accounting are "very mechanical and formulaic," AI will easily replace them, so he refuses to invest in this industry. Support: By analyzing the nature of the industry, he judges that technology trends are "enemies" rather than "friends."

5. Use ROIC to screen industries, not P/E ratios. Brad Jacobs believes that the ultimate measure of business value is "return on invested capital (ROIC)." Regardless of market style, high-ROIC companies will create value over the long term. Support: He uses this as the final basis for all M&A decisions.

6. Judge deal quality from the "seller's personality." Brad Jacobs insists, "If I don't like the seller, I won't buy the company," because the company is an "extension" of the seller, reflecting qualities like honesty and ethics. Support: He observes a positive correlation between the personalities of buyers and sellers and the outcome of the deal.

7. Timing of large-scale buybacks: when the market irrationally "misjudges." Brad Jacobs believes that when the stock price falls due to short-term sentiment or short-seller reports rather than fundamental changes, it is the best time for large-scale buybacks. Support: After the short-seller report in 2018, XPO's stock fell irrationally, becoming the opportunity for "unhesitating" buyback.

8. The "one trick" for M&A integration: rapid standardization. Brad Jacobs emphasizes that quickly integrating the acquired company into a unified IT system, CRM, KPI, and financial system is key to integration success, despite short-term discomfort. Support: His early mistake was "integrating too slowly"; now he advocates "doing it as fast as tearing off a band-aid."

~10 min full read
Deep Analysis