← Back to list
Colossus (Invest Like the Best / Business Breakdowns)Podcast31 Jan 2017Source: traffic.libsyn.comHost: Patrick O'Shaughnessy

Brent Beshore Returns – Private Equity, Venture Capital, and the Future of Money Management - [Invest Like the Best, EP.22]

In plain words

This interview digs into the inner workings of private equity and venture capital. Brent Beshore argues that buying small companies at a cheap 7x earnings is a trap—keeping them profitable is so hard that most deals lose money. He warns that VC is like 'steroids' for startups, forcing them to go big or die, often killing good businesses. Key holdings mentioned: Amazon (great brand, return policy feels like 'stealing'), 3G Capital (risky, its cost-cutting focus may hurt long-term culture), Netflix (content quality varies wildly, but that high variance creates fun anticipation).

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

Brent Beshore engaged in a 10-hour in-depth conversation with the host, focusing on the future of private equity, venture capital, and asset management. Key insights include the importance of branding in investing, valuation differences between public and private companies, and the value of peer men

~8 min full read · 6 sections
Deep Analysis

Here is the translation of your analysis of the Brent Beshore interview, following all specified rules.

At a Glance

Brent Beshore is the head of Adventur.es, a private equity firm focused on acquiring and operating small and medium-sized private businesses. This episode delves into the mechanics and pitfalls of the private equity and venture capital industries, as well as the value of personal branding. Brent Beshore's core judgment is that in small and medium-sized private business investing, buying at a 7x P/E ratio appears attractive, but actual investment returns are far lower than theoretical values. This is because maintaining the stable profitability of these businesses is extremely difficult, and most such investments ultimately lose their principal.

Private Equity's Layered Game: From "Knife Fights" to "30,000 Feet"

Beshore argues that the sources of returns in the private equity industry vary significantly with deal size, and not all PE firms generate excess returns.

  • Top Tier (Large Deals): The return advantage for large PE funds (e.g., KKR, Carlyle) primarily comes from a transaction difficulty premium. They face the same (non-proprietary) deal flow, but acquiring and selling large companies requires extremely high professional skills (e.g., structuring, negotiation, finding buyers). Beshore notes: "At the highest level, I think that's where you get your premium returns."
  • Middle Tier (Mid-Sized Deals): Relationships, personality, and proprietary deal flow begin to matter. With fewer buyers and higher seller concentration, market volatility (the Mr. Market effect) is greater, creating opportunities for buyers with unique skills and reputations.
  • Bottom Tier (Small and Medium-Sized Deals): This is Beshore's primary battlefield. He describes operating these businesses as "knife fights," facing various micro-level fluctuations (personnel, competition, local regulations) daily. He believes the theoretical 7x P/E ratio (14% starting return) is highly deceptive. He warns: "If you just buy and hold, letting the management team 'do business as usual,' you'll probably get a few years of returns, and then you'll lose your entire principal." Therefore, the low valuations in this market (typically 2-5x) are compensation for its extremely high operational difficulty and risk.

Venture Capital: "Steroids" and the "Power Law"

Beshore is highly critical of the venture capital industry, arguing it has serious problems at three levels: entrepreneurs, VC firms, and LP investors.

  • For Entrepreneurs: Venture capital is a "steroid injection," forcing companies onto an extreme "go big or go home" path. High burn rates (often 1-2x revenue) and constant equity dilution (15-40% in seed rounds, 20-30% in Series A) are the norm. He believes many companies that could have succeeded fail because they took VC money, but rarely sees companies that should have taken VC but didn't.
  • For VC Firms: This is one of the hardest businesses in the world to make money in. The industry follows a power law distribution, where only top-tier funds consistently generate excess returns. Beshore points out that the VC industry is full of "showmanship," where personal branding and networks are crucial, but "if you don't have the 'go' to back it up, your 'show' will eventually collapse."
  • For LP Investors: Unless they can access the very top VC funds, LP returns will be very mediocre. He cites the Kauffman Foundation report, noting that out of the 100 VC funds it invested in, only a few outperformed public markets. High management fees and carried interest (2/20) consume most of the gains.

Personal Brand: Substance First, Not Fame First

Beshore believes the value of a personal brand lies in having solid "go" (substance) behind it; otherwise, it's just an empty "show."

  • Definition of Brand: Beshore defines a brand as "the distribution of outcomes you can expect from any company or individual." An excellent brand (like Amazon) has a narrow, positive distribution, giving you high confidence in every interaction. A poor brand has a wide distribution with a low peak.
  • "Go" First: He emphasizes that a personal brand should be "discovered," not deliberately "built." He uses Warren Buffett as an example, noting that Buffett only gradually built his "Oracle of Omaha" personal brand after his investment performance was "radiant." Beshore concludes: "If you try to build a brand without having the 'go,' you're just wasting your time and money."

Position Moves

Position Guest's Stance Key Data
Amazon Positive Case (Brand) As a consumer, Beshore believes its brand distribution is "very narrow and good," giving the example of Amazon "siding with you" on returns, making him feel "like he's stealing."
Apple Neutral Discussion (Brand) Discussed as a brand case. Beshore believes its brand distribution is likely "above average, but almost entirely on the positive side," such as the "magical" surprise of AirPods.
Netflix Neutral Discussion (Brand) Discussed as a brand case. Beshore believes the quality distribution of its original content is "higher" (mostly garbage, a few excellent), and this high dispersion actually creates the "fun" of anticipation.
3G Capital Risk Warning Expresses concern about its "cost-cutting" model, believing it works short-term but can damage company culture long-term. Beshore says: "If you plan to hold a company for the long term... I think you get into some dangerous territory."
Parker Gale Positive Mention As an investment firm focused on tech-enabled businesses, Beshore believes paying higher multiples (above market average) is reasonable because their targets have higher growth rates and sustainability.

Judgments Worth Remembering

1. "Small businesses don't stay small on purpose" (Brent Beshore): Many small businesses are small because they lack a sustainable moat. The founder is the moat, but this is non-transferable. The key to investing is finding businesses where the moat is decoupled from the founder's personal charisma.

2. "In small and medium-sized private businesses, the 14% return from a 7x P/E is an illusion" (Brent Beshore): The theoretical calculation is attractive, but the reality is that maintaining stable profitability for these businesses is extremely difficult. If you just buy and hold, most investments will ultimately lose their principal. Low valuations are compensation for high operational risk and difficulty.

3. "Venture capital is a steroid injection" (Brent Beshore): Once you take VC money, the company is forced onto an extreme "go big or go home" path. High burn rates and constant equity dilution are the norm, and many potentially successful companies are "killed" by this pressure.

4. "The VC industry follows a power law distribution; only top-tier funds make money" (Brent Beshore): For LP investors, unless they can access the very top funds, returns will be very mediocre. High management fees (2/20) consume most of the gains.

5. "A personal brand is a byproduct of 'go' (substance), not a product of 'show' (performance)" (Brent Beshore): Buffett had astonishing investment performance before he built his personal brand. Deliberately building a brand without substance will eventually become "hollow" and collapse. A brand is "the peak and dispersion of the distribution of outcomes you expect."

6. "In the present moment, everyone is acting rationally based on their own information and preferences" (Brent Beshore, paraphrasing the Austrian School of Economics): This insight changed his view of others' behavior from "they're crazy" to "why do they think that way?", significantly reducing his anxiety and increasing his empathy.

7. "The traditional PE 5-year holding period is a 'pressure cooker'" (Brent Beshore): This time pressure forces managers into short-sighted decisions and transmits immense pressure to the operating team. In contrast, he prefers long-term holding, creating cash flow returns through continuous operational improvement rather than relying on a one-time exit transaction.

8. "The best advice Charlie Munger gave me was 'don't try to impress people'" (Brent Beshore): Munger believed the biggest negative factor in his life was always trying to prove he was smarter than others. Learning to "conceal your judgment" makes one more successful.