The National Basketball Association - [Business Breakdowns, EP. 104]

At a Glance

Ethan Strauss (former NBA beat writer, ESPN reporter, now an independent journalist) deconstructs the NBA's business logic. Core thesis: The NBA is undergoing an "unacknowledged crisis"—viewership has halved since 2016, yet media rights fees could double or triple by 2025. This paradox of "fewer viewers, higher profits" masks the league's structural decline.

---

1. Ratings Halved, Yet Why Can Rights Fees Still Double?

Ethan Strauss argues that NBA ratings have declined approximately 50% from their 2016 peak, yet the next round of media rights negotiations (2025) is still expected to achieve a 200%-300% increase. This seems contradictory but stems from a counterintuitive logic: the shrinking cable TV ecosystem has instead made the NBA an "anchor asset."

• Mechanism Breakdown: As users "cut the cord," the viewer base of traditional television networks continues to shrink. Against this backdrop, broadcasters (ESPN, TNT, etc.) need live content that can guarantee "at least millions of viewers" to stabilize their core audience. Although NBA ratings have declined, the rate of decline is slower than that of ordinary programming, making it a "relative scarcity."
• Data Chain: The current NBA national broadcast contract is $2.7 billion per year (signed in 2014, effective in 2016); the NFL contract is approximately $10 billion per year (signed in 2021). Considering that the average regular-season game rating for the NBA is only one-tenth that of the NFL, the ratio of $2.7 billion to $10 billion actually favors the NBA.
• Extrapolation and Falsification: Strauss points out that if the NBA could maintain its 2016 ratings, player salaries could reach $200 million per year. However, the reality is that the decline in ratings represents "tens of billions of dollars in opportunity cost," merely masked by the numerical growth of new contracts. Falsification condition: if the actual increase in the next contract falls below 100%, it would indicate that the "anchor asset" logic has failed.

> "If they had the viewership now that they had in 2016, they would be making tens of billions more." (Meaning: If the NBA still had its 2016 ratings today, it could earn hundreds of billions more.)

---

2. China Strategy: An "Unrealized Whale Bet"

Strauss argues that the NBA's investment in the Chinese market over the past two decades was an "overhyped gamble"—the league pinned its growth hopes on China while neglecting its domestic market, ultimately suffering setbacks due to the Daryl Morey incident (2019) and its own inadequate talent development.

• Historical Context: The NBA has invested in China for over 20 years, initially broadcasting games for free to cultivate the market and establishing training camps and venues. After Morey's tweet regarding Hong Kong in 2019, China cut ties, costing the NBA "hundreds of millions of dollars." Strauss calls this the "unrealized whale effect"—a company becomes distracted by a large potential client that may choose it, thereby neglecting existing profitable sources.
• Mechanism Breakdown: The NBA failed to cultivate homegrown superstar players in China. Despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars on training camps, only two Japanese players and one Finnish player have entered the NBA to date, while China, a country of 1.4 billion people, has not produced a top-tier star. Strauss believes that Chinese nationalism and aesthetic fatigue from "watching foreigners win" are the underlying reasons.
• Data and Comparison: During the Yao Ming era, his vote count in All-Star voting far exceeded that of other players, demonstrating the potential of the Chinese market. However, after the Morey incident, the NBA "may never return to its former state" in China—because once it becomes clear that an investment could be wiped out in an instant, the same level of commitment will not be made again.

> “The NBA was so cynical as to be naive in thinking they could just internationalize themselves and experience no cost at home.”

---

3. Player Power: The League's "Gift and Curse"

Strauss points out that NBA players wield far greater individual influence than those in any other major sports league—a single superstar can be worth billions of dollars (e.g., Curry's estimated contribution to Under Armour's valuation reaches $12 billion). However, this power also leads to disorder in league governance.

• Mechanism Breakdown: The "exposed" nature of NBA players (no helmets, no protective gear) naturally elevates their personal brands above those of NFL players. Top players often earn more from sneaker contracts than from their salaries—Michael Jordan receives over $100 million annually from Nike, far exceeding his total career salary. LeBron James has a lifetime contract with Nike, and in theory, Nike's influence over him could surpass that of any team.
• Specific Case: In the Ja Morant gun incident, the league, teams, and Nike all responded with a "mild" tone. Strauss believes this is a clear sign of excessive player power—"a young man is worth billions to others, so everyone revolves around him and dares not speak harshly."
• Projection: Excessive player power has led to the normalization of load management, a lack of competitiveness in the All-Star Game, and a loose league culture. Strauss argues that the biggest difference between Adam Silver and David Stern is that Stern was a "hands-on Caesar," while Silver is someone "no one can feel his presence."

---

4. The International Star Paradox: Global Success Hurts the Domestic Market

Strauss presents a counterintuitive view: The NBA's success in cultivating international stars (Giannis Antetokounmpo, Nikola Jokić, Luka Dončić, etc.) has paradoxically weakened its appeal in the U.S. domestic market.

• Data chain: Among the current top NBA players, a majority hail from Slovenia (Dončić), Serbia (Jokić), Greece (Giannis), and Cameroon (Embiid). These countries have a combined population of only about 20 million (former Yugoslavia region), yet they concentrate the league's elite talent.
• Mechanism breakdown: American audiences have a natural affinity for domestic players (e.g., the World Cup effect), while international stars face a "cultural barrier"—differences in language, personality, and media interaction styles make it difficult to establish emotional connections. Strauss argues that NBA management "projected their own international perspective onto the audience," mistakenly believing that viewers do not care about players' nationalities.
• Historical comparison: Hakeem Olajuwon (Nigerian-born) and Dirk Nowitzki (German) successfully integrated into the U.S. market because the former played college basketball in America, and the latter was fluent in English with an outgoing personality. In contrast, Balkan players "don't communicate much with the media," creating marketing challenges.

> "The NBA did not want these guys to be from these places. But these places just happened to be the places that produced the superstars."

---

5. League Governance: From "Caesar" to "Invisible Man"

Strauss holds an extremely negative view of current Commissioner Adam Silver, describing him as "overall a very bad commissioner" who lacks the authority and sense of direction of David Stern.

• Comparative Analysis: Stern (1984-2014) would personally intervene in broadcasters' programming arrangements (e.g., demanding Marv Albert as commentator) and even "yell at" partners. Silver, by contrast, focuses primarily on maintaining relationships with broadcasting companies, with little restraint over player behavior and league culture.
• Specific Manifestations: In the Ben Simmons refusal-to-play-for-the-76ers incident, Silver chose to "avoid trouble"; after the Ja Morant gun incident, Silver "has yet to make any statement to this day." Strauss argues this has left the league "without a sense of direction"—players can decide at will whether to play, the All-Star Game has devolved into a spectacle, and the league culture is "loose and formless."
• Inference: Strauss believes that the "highlight moment" early in Silver's tenure (the lifetime ban of Donald Sterling) led him to mistakenly believe that "always acting in accordance with players' wishes" is correct. But what the public truly needs is a sense of structure with "rules and consequences."

---

Mentioned Positions

Position	Analyst Stance	Key Data
NBA League	Risk Warning (Structural Decline)	Viewership down approximately 50% from 2016; 2025 media rights target is 2-3 times the current $2.7 billion
Los Angeles Lakers	Neutral (Regional Media Advantage)	2017 regional media revenue of $150 million, paid revenue sharing of approximately $50 million
Memphis Grizzlies	Neutral (Regional Media Disadvantage)	2017 regional media revenue of $10 million, received revenue sharing of $32 million
Golden State Warriors	Bullish (Operations & Brand)	Owner Joe Lacob described as "a boss with character"; Curry's contribution to Under Armour's valuation reached $12 billion
New York Knicks	Risk Warning (Governance Issues)	Owner James Dolan "has led the team into the abyss for decades, yet no one can change it"
Nike	Neutral (Implicit Influence)	Michael Jordan's annual income exceeds $100 million (from Nike); LeBron James' lifetime contract
Under Armour	Neutral (Case Reference)	Brand value surged after Curry's signing, but later "collapsed due to complex reasons"

---

Judgments Worth Remembering

1. “Fewer viewers, higher profits” is a paradox for the NBA, not a victory (Ethan Strauss) — Ratings have halved, but rights fees have doubled due to “anchor asset” logic, masking billions of dollars in opportunity costs. If ratings had remained at 2016 levels, player salaries could have reached $200 million per year.

2. The NBA’s China strategy is a textbook case of the “unresolved whale effect” (Ethan Strauss) — Companies become distracted by a large client that might choose them, neglecting existing profitable sources. After 20 years of investment in China, the league ultimately suffered setbacks due to the Morey incident and the failure to cultivate local stars.

3. Excessive player power is both a “gift and a curse” for the NBA (Ethan Strauss) — A single superstar can be worth billions of dollars (e.g., Stephen Curry), but this leads to disorder in league governance: load management has become normalized, the All-Star Game lacks competitiveness, and management dares not discipline player behavior.

4. The boom in international stars has paradoxically hurt the domestic market (Ethan Strauss) — Top stars from smaller countries, such as Nikola Jokić, Luka Dončić, and Giannis Antetokounmpo, struggle to build emotional connections with American audiences due to cultural barriers. The NBA’s “projection of its own international perspective onto viewers” is a miscalculation.

5. Adam Silver is an “invisible man,” while David Stern was a “Caesar” (Ethan Strauss) — Stern would personally intervene in broadcasters’ programming schedules, whereas Silver “leaves no one feeling his presence.” The league needs a sense of structure with “rules and consequences,” rather than simply pandering to players.

6. The NBA “redeemed itself” after Jordan’s retirement but then forgot the lesson (Ethan Strauss) — The league reversed the ratings decline of the early 2000s by modifying rules (encouraging offense), but after success, it fell into complacency and shifted its bet to China, leading to a repeat of past mistakes.

7. The NFL’s marketing investment far exceeds the NBA’s, which is one reason the latter has lost competitiveness (Ethan Strauss) — The NFL has systematic content marketing such as NFL Films, Hard Knocks, and playoff promotional videos (e.g., narrated by John Malkovich), while the NBA “lacks that kind of drive.”

8. Shoe contracts may determine player destinations more than team contracts (Ethan Strauss) — When Kevin Durant moved from the Thunder to the Warriors, Nike wanted him to join the Warriors (due to the larger Bay Area market). Although Durant would not admit it, the implicit influence of shoe companies is a variable the league cannot control.