← Back to list
Baillie Gifford China Growth TrustArticle9 Jul 2026Source: bailliegifford.com

Baillie Gifford China Growth Investment Trust Factsheet

In plain words

This summary covers a monthly update for the Baillie Gifford China Growth fund. The fund rose 22% in the past year, beating the market average, but over five years it lost 27%—worse than its benchmark. The reason is that it concentrates money in a few high-growth firms, like ByteDance at around 14% of assets. That makes returns swing sharply. For ordinary investors, this means the fund is risky: a good recent year doesn't guarantee long-term results. It's worth reading because it shows why you should check both short- and long-term performance and how concentrated a fund is before investing.

AI SummaryAI-generated · may contain errors · verify against the original

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is an actively managed trust focused on Chinese companies, targeting long-term capital appreciation. It typically holds 40–80 stocks, with up to 20% of assets permitted in unlisted companies. As of 30 June 2026, total assets stood at £190.62m, with a share price of

~4 min full read · 3 sections
Deep Analysis

This Month's Scorecard

For the 12 months ended June 30, 2026, the fund returned 25.5% in share price terms and 22.3% in NAV terms, outperforming the MSCI China All Shares benchmark (13.3%) by 9.0 percentage points; over five years, however, the cumulative NAV return was -26.8%, lagging the benchmark by 12.3 percentage points — a striking contrast between short- and long-term performance.

Metric 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years
Fund (Share Price) 25.5% 44.4% -36.2% 39.3%
Fund (NAV) 22.3% 38.5% -26.8% 26.5%
Benchmark (MSCI China All Shares) 13.3% 28.4% -14.5% 44.3%
NAV Excess +9.0pct +10.1pct -12.3pct -17.8pct

Broken down by annual period (year ended each June 30), NAV returns were: 2022 -27.1%, 2023 -27.5%, 2024 -10.2%, 2025 +26.2%, 2026 +22.3%, versus benchmark returns of -15.1%, -21.6%, -3.6%, +17.6%, and +13.3% — significant underperformance in each of the first three years, followed by outperformance in the last two. Note: the benchmark was changed from MSCI AC Asia ex Pacific to MSCI China All Shares on September 16, 2020; multi-year comparisons are chain-linked data, and the measurement basis is not entirely consistent.

Portfolio Structure

The portfolio comprises 59 holdings, with the top ten accounting for 47.6% and the top 30 for 79.5%; ByteDance alone represents 14.5% of assets, and together with Tencent (9.1%) the top two weights exceed 23%, forming a structure of "heavy positions in growth leaders plus a long tail." The report does not disclose purchases or sales during the period, so cash flow direction cannot be determined.

Top Ten Holdings % of Assets
ByteDance 14.5%
Tencent 9.1%
Alibaba 4.5%
CATL 4.0%
Zhongji Innolight 3.4%
Ping An Insurance 2.9%
China Construction Bank 2.3%
NAURA Technology Group 2.3%
Kweichow Moutai 2.3%
China Merchants Bank 2.3%
Total 47.6%

Sector allocation: Communication Services 25.6%, Information Technology 19.8%, Consumer Discretionary 18.5%, Industrials 12.2%, Financials 7.5%, Materials 7.4%, Consumer Staples 2.8%, Energy 2.2%, Utilities 1.8%, Health Care 1.8%, net current assets 0.4%.

Fund Notes

The fund has total assets of £190.62m and total borrowings of £7.97m, giving gross gearing of 4% and net gearing of 3%; the share price of 305.00p represents a 9.0% discount to the NAV of 335.03p.

  • Costs and structure: ongoing charge of 1.06%, dividend yield of 0.7%, active share of 66% (versus MSCI China All Shares), annual turnover of 24%; the management fee is tiered at 0.75% on the first £50m of NAV, 0.65% on the £50–250m portion, and 0.55% on assets above £250m. The managers are Linda Lin (Partner) and Sophie Earnshaw, with a five-year investment horizon and a strong growth bias; up to 20% of assets may be invested in unlisted companies, and the fund typically holds 40–80 positions.
  • Risks listed in the report itself: unlisted investments (ByteDance being a typical example) are difficult to price and difficult to sell, and after a sharp rise in valuations a subsequent decline would have a greater impact; leverage amplifies losses; exposure is concentrated in a single market and currency. Readers should note that the report explicitly states it "seeks significant upside in every holding" — an expression reflecting the perspective of the position holder.
  • This factsheet is purely a data disclosure, with no manager commentary on the market or individual stocks; the "Awards and Ratings" Morningstar rating display is marketing content, and this analysis does not accept its rating as an endorsement.